Talk:Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
History
[edit]That introductory paragraph could use some help, especially the second sentence. Stacyrp (talk) 00:34, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
American Airline controversy
[edit]The American Airline controversy is listed under the section titled "Recognition."
I think it would be better to add a section called "Controversies," and add the paragraph under the new section. Recognition kind of implies something benign or good, and that's not the case for what happened with the court case. Additionally, I think a "Controversies" section is pretty standard for wikipedia articles that point out bad things.
(Eventually, that paragraph should include the firm was fired by American Airlines. And the firm's responce (firing the attorney?) should be included in the response).
Categories:
- Stub-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Stub-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Stub-Class New York City articles
- Unknown-importance New York City articles
- WikiProject New York City articles
- Articles edited by connected contributors