Talk:Within (The X-Files)

Within (The X-Files) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Within (The X-Files) is part of the The X-Files Mythology, Volume 3 series, a good topic. It is also part of the The X-Files (season 8) series, a good topic. These are identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve them, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 4, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed
July 26, 2012	Good topic candidate	Promoted
July 26, 2012	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television: Episode coverage / The X-Files

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This article is supported by the X-Files task force (assessed as High-importance).
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Reception section

Since this article has been nominated for GA, its reception section really needs to be beefed up. All it has is a single critique from fans. There is no critical commentary present, which is essential for an episode article. Ω phois 00:30, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Within (The X-Files)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wizardman _{Help review good articles} 17:08, 1 January 2010 (UTC) Upon looking through this article, it seems to need a lot of work. Here's what I found:[reply]

Why does it say (part 2) in the title? I can't find a part 1. Done
Plot should be sourced. Can be done in the same style as the Sleepless article. Done
There is no critical reception in the article, just some fan notes. Definitely needs fixing. Done

While the prose itself is fine, as noted above the couple issues I did find are pretty major. I'll put it on hold and give you a week to fix/expand the article. Wizardman _{Help review good articles} 17:08, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The issues are fixed, so I'll pass the article. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 16:55, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Within (The X-Files). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.space.com/sciencefiction/tv/xfiles_801_001106.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:03, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]