Talk:Wolfman's Got Nards

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BorgQueen talk 20:22, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the documentary Wolfman's Got Nards takes its title from a memorable line in the 1987 film The Monster Squad?

Source: https://nerdist.com/article/wolfmans-got-nards-review-monster-squad/

Reviewed:

Created by CFA (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

C F A 💬 22:48, 30 July 2024 (UTC).[reply]

CFA The article is long enough, new enough, and neutral with no copyright violations. A QPQ is not needed. There are a few problems. Ain't It Cool News and In The Seats don't appear to be reliable sources, and the Ain't It Cool News article was written under a username. For "although they were notably primarily from genre film outlets rather than mainstream media.", there would have to be a source that says such a statement. SL93 (talk) 23:31, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SL93: Ain't It Cool News is considered reliable per WP:NPPSG, though I agree that the username is suspicious. I don't see why In The Seats wouldn't be considered reliable, as they appear to have an editorial team. Regardless, the Alamo Drafthouse claim is also verifiable in the Entertainment Weekly article. I removed the mainstream media claim as unverifiable. Can't find where it came from. C F A 💬 00:12, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CFA I didn't know that page existed. Does Ain't It Cool News contributors often use usernames that link to Twitter? As for In The Seats, it looks fine with the editors. SL93 (talk) 00:46, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I looked through the website, and it's common. I am passing this. SL93 (talk) 00:48, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]