Talk:Women's rights in 2014

This article was nominated for deletion on 17 June 2015. The result of the discussion was keep.

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Feminism Low‑importance

	Feminism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Years Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Index 1, 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 20 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Campus Rape a bit narrow and anecdotal

I think the section jumps into some details, rather than providing some of the more important changes including continued developments in making it easier for women to report and get heard, significant increases in Clery Act investigations, improvements in support for women etc. The Emma Sulcowitz case is probably too detailed and singular an example for such a high level article. Also, for an article that's supposedly global in scope, this is a very US-centric section. Accordingly, it seems overweight as written. Mattnad (talk) 15:40, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Radical Islam, disciplinary panels

@Chess: I recognize that your edits are made in good faith, but the content you recently added was WP:UNDUE and lacks a neutral point of view. The overabundance of Washington Examiner sources aren't really a plus either. Let's stick to topics that are directly related to women's rights. Please observe WP:BRD and gain consensus for changes you want to make here. gobonobo ⁺ ^c 03:28, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is fighting against radical Islam's attacks on women not related to women's rights? Grognard Extraordinaire Chess (talk) Ping when replying 16:20, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]