Talk:Xploded Music

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Xploded Music article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Electronic music Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lancashire and Cumbria Low‑importance

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Music of the United Kingdom (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Music of the United Kingdom, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Music of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Music of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Music of the United KingdomMusic of the United Kingdom articles

Record Labels Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Record Labels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of record labels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Record LabelsWikipedia:WikiProject Record LabelsTemplate:WikiProject Record Labelsrecord labels articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

unsigned and undated comment (pre-December 2012)

We need to add more of the AATW Discography to this article. Also, sales information.

Artists not signed to AATW

Some of the artists listed on this page don't seem to signed to AATW, any chance of more citations to show that all artists listed here are signed (directly or indirectly) to AATW? Jatos (talk) 21:47, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cascada - Miracle

This single was actually released on the Incentive Record Label as they held the rights to it before AATW signed Cascada. Jamesb1 09:50, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chart Success Section

Anyone think of a better way to format this? --neonwhite user page talk 23:22, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Toni Di Bart

I could be wrong on this, but I thought I'd read somewhere that AATW didn't release any of Toni Di Bart's singles when they were first released. Weren't the rights to the singles acquired only recently in the las few years. In any case, I'm pretty certain that Turn This Love Around never reached Number 1. The only one of his singles to do so was The Real Thing. If no one disagrees, I'll delete this from the Number 1 info in this article. Jamesb1 (talk) 10:18, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

According to his wikipedia article it was 'The Real Thing' that was a uk number 1. Discogs confirms none of his singles were released on AATW. --neonwhite user page talk 22:16, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All Saints

Just for clarification: Taken from AATW website 12-9-2008 [1] Over the past few days we've been slightly bombarded via e-mail and our YouTube inbox about when we are releasing the new All Saints album. Going back quite a few months to earlier this year, we did release Daddy O - a track by the Wideboys ft. Shaznay Lewis. At the time there was an article in one of the tabloids saying that we had signed All Saints, no idea where the story came from but needless to say it wasn't correct. Shaznay featured on a track by The Wideboys, who are one of our artists, but that's about as far as our involvement with any of the girls goes I'm afraid.

A few of you have mentioned the press release for Daddy O said that All Saints were recording new material and would be back later in 2008. The press release came from the PR people working on the Daddy O single with Shaznay and the guys so we've no reason to doubt it was accurate at the time, but it did not say the girls were signed to AATW, merely that Shaznay had taken a break from that to come and do a track with us. If you interpreted it differently then apologies for any confusion but you were probably reading a bit too much into it... So, just to be clear, All Saints are not signed to AATW. Jamesb1 (talk) 10:30, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on All Around the World Productions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120719030151/http://licensing.ofcom.org.uk/tv-broadcast-licences/updates/052012 to http://licensing.ofcom.org.uk/tv-broadcast-licences/updates/052012

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:42, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]