Talk:You're My Best Friend (Queen song)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the You're My Best Friend (Queen song) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Deletion
[edit]Why on earth should this article be deleted?!? --feline1 15:46, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
Obviously a mistake or prank. Somebody remove the notice. --70.188.134.238 22:09, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
time dilation
[edit]Brian May says that in '39 a man comes back 100 years later to find his daughter still alive. How is this possible, if most people don't live for a century. Even in the future, this seems a bit unlikely. Perhaps he finds his grandaughter and sees that she has his daughter's eyes? Or did the writer of the song just make a mistake?
A couple of explanations - the entire story takes place in the future, so maybe by that time people will have mastered the art of longevity.
Second, the song says "Your mother's eyes, from your eyes, cry to me". Your explanation above could fit, or it could be the man's wife/girlfriend gave up and found someone else years later (thus, a daughter that would be less than 100 years old). 70.176.186.10 30 June 2005 20:01 (UTC)
- And you're assuming it's a literal "your mother." It could just as easily be a figurative sense, as in "your foremothers"- that is, she's a female descendent of his wife. Taken that way, it could be a grandaughter, a great grandaughter, a great-great grandaughter, whatever. It could, in fact, be hundreds of generations later- all we know is that it's been in one or more increments of a hundred years since they left- in a '39, in other words.--Deridolus 23:55, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
- May is referring to the "time dilation effect" which Einstein's theory of special relativity predicts will happen if you travel close to the speed of light. Time passess more slowly for the man in the spaceship than for his folks back on earth. May studied astronomy at post-graduate level, so he would have been familiar with the concept.--feline1 15:46, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
Roger's High Notes
[edit]On "A Night At the Opera", Roger is singing that high B flat falsetto in '39. This doesn't seem unreasonable, as he sings the very same note elsewhere on the album (Bohemian Rhapsody)... it would seem to be his "top note" - he never goes above it to my knowledge (eg My Fairy King, In the Lap of the Gods, Seven Seas of Rhye.... these have top A, one semitone lower) This being the case, one wonders why he would "refuse" to sing the note in '39, but not Bohemian Rhapsody! Nonetheless, on "Live Killers", that version of '39 is indeed pitched one semitone down from the album version.... and there are numerous bootlegs where Taylor fails woefully to reach even that A note during the late 70s...
Cut off?
[edit]- John Deacon: Well, Freddie didn’t like the electric piano, so I took it home and I started to learn on the electric piano and basically that’s the song that came out you know when I was learning to play piano. It was written on that instrument and it sounds best on that. You know, often on the instrument that you wrote the song on
Is this a misquote or does it really end like this? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.56.143.227 (talk) 00:57, 9 January 2007 (UTC).
John Deacon
[edit]The article alledges that John Deacon sang backing vocals on the record, but I've looked that up on Google and found out that he never sang on a record. Am I wrong or am I right? Did he sing backing vocals on that one record? Someone tell me, it's got me really confused. Cheers, TopGearFreak (talk) 15:57, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
It's true, Deacon never sang on any records. He only sang backing vocals live for some songs (Like Radio GaGa for example) Bart-16 (talk) 06:07, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
The Composition Section.
[edit]It's grammatic garbage and wreaks of everything but neutrality. "a really passionate performance?" And since when were phrases like "a lot of" wikipedia-worthy? And the parentheticals. They're a good half of the section. Most of them aren't even necessary, nevermind accurate. While C major has all the same notes as A minor, the two are relative keys, not one in the same. The song is clearly in C major as it resolves on C major. I have no idea what 12/8 is going in there. And to whom does the pronoun "his" refer? Could it perhaps be replaced with "the band's"? I'm sorry if I sound a tad ranty but this simply must be changed. No excuses. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Strangebrownbag (talk • contribs) 22:03, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on You're My Best Friend (Queen song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20111117120047/http://www.queensongs.info:80/the-book/songwriting-analyses/no-synth-era/a-night-at-the-opera/youre-my-best-friend.html to http://www.queensongs.info/the-book/songwriting-analyses/no-synth-era/a-night-at-the-opera/youre-my-best-friend.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:36, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on You're My Best Friend (Queen song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402172606/http://50.6.195.142/archives/70s_files/19760731.html to http://50.6.195.142/archives/70s_files/19760731.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160602084720/http://australian-charts.com/forum.asp?todo=viewthread&id=35092 to http://australian-charts.com/forum.asp?todo=viewthread&id=35092
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:08, 10 November 2016 (UTC)