Talk:Zara-class cruiser (1879)

Zara-class cruiser (1879) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: September 5, 2017. (Reviewed version).

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Zara-class cruiser (1879)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Iazyges (talk · contribs) 15:08, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Will start soon. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 15:08, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can see, the article fits the "Immediate Pass" bill; some prose suggestions are offered, but the prose is already understandable, so it is passable. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 18:06, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria

GA Criteria

GA Criteria:

1
1.a Y

1.b Y
2
2.a Y

2.b Y

2.c Y

2.d Y
3
3.a Y

3.b Y
4
4.a Y
5
5.a Y
6
6.a Y

6.b Y

No DAB links Y
No Dead links Y
Images appropriately licensed Y

Prose Suggestions

"Despite the lengthy design process, the ships proved to be failures in service, primarily the result of their low speed." perhaps "primarily as a result of their low speed" or " primarily because of their low speed"
- Works for me.
" As a result of her different hull, Sebenico is sometimes not included in the Zara class." More of a personal question, but is it mentioned if she is considered her own class, or part of a different class? -- Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 18:12, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Conway's and Greger both list her as a unique type. Thanks for these two reviews, Iazyges. Parsecboy (talk) 18:25, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]