Talk:Zaranj

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Zaranj article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Afghanistan Low‑importance

	Afghanistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Afghanistan, a project to maintain and expand Afghanistan-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AfghanistanWikipedia:WikiProject AfghanistanTemplate:WikiProject AfghanistanAfghanistan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

It is requested that an image or photograph of Zaranj be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.

Wikipedians in Afghanistan may be able to help!

The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Untitled

Someone keeps deleting my entry on the ethnography of Zaraj and Nimroz, to replace it with erroneous, Pashtun-centric misinformation. Please stop. You can change the information on Wiki and try to delete the existence of other ethnic and religious groups in that country, but unless you intend to also engage in ruthless ethnic cleansing of the non-Pashtuns groups as well as the followers of the Shia branch of Islam, then your vandalizing these pages will mean nothing except perpetuating ignorance about that country. I have placed the information sources for all to examine for accuracy at the bottom of the entry on Ethnography. izadyIzady (talk) 16:35, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

According to official figures by the Islamic republic of Afghanistan[1], the ethnic groups are as follow: Baloch at 44%, Pashtun at 34% and Tajik at 22%.[2]--Nasir Ghobar (talk) 15:56, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

NPS tribal maps

I have reverted an edit by Inuit18. We have been over NPS' tribal maps at Talk:Kabul_Province#NPS_tribal_map. These maps are not ethnic, but tribal maps and they totally contradict other sources. Like mentioned at Kabul Province's discussion page, it would be very hard to find another reliable source to prove that Zaranj has a Tajik majority and according to wikipedia "...the views of tiny minorities should not be included at all.". (Ketabtoon (talk) 05:27, 2 March 2010 (UTC))[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Zaranj. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151031111515/http://unhabitat.org/books/soac2015/ to http://unhabitat.org/books/soac2015/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:54, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]