Talk:Zift

Bulgaria Low‑importance

	Bulgaria portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bulgaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bulgaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BulgariaWikipedia:WikiProject BulgariaTemplate:WikiProject BulgariaBulgaria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comedy

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Film

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.

Transliteration

Proper transliteration of the film is Dzift, not Zift. The word in Bulgarian means "tar" though is often used in slang for "shit". As this correction includes changing the name of the article, I'm leaving this to be discussed.

Always do this and this before attempting anything. Google can sometimes render any discussion unnecessary :) All the best, Todor →Bozhinov 07:42, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How sad to see the film's PR (and its improper use of transliteration) brought up via Google searches as "proof" of what is right or wrong. 89.190.196.66 (talk) 11:23, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

just because the vast majority of bulgarians do not know transliteration rules, does not make their renditions in latin 'correct'. there are after all, simple transliteration rules. best to you too. ;) 193.194.140.210 (talk) 13:56, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the official website ought to convince you then. Best, Todor →Bozhinov 14:34, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it appears the official website does not follow transliteration rules either. In general, transliteration rules are not followed in Bulgaria, people tend to improvise, going by what they think is "the right way." This, unfortunately, is true for official institutions, as well as private companies. Anyway, seems this discussion has turned anal. Adding the redirect from dzift was all that was needed. 92.247.214.95 (talk) 07:18, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Zift. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130421050837/http://www.moscowfilmfestival.ru/miff34/eng/archives/?year=2008 to http://www.moscowfilmfestival.ru/miff34/eng/archives/?year=2008

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:13, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]