Template:Did you know nominations/6th National Congress of the Communist Party of Vietnam

The following is an archived discussion of 6th National Congress of the Communist Party of Vietnam's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you know (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: rejected by OCNative (talk) 21:25, 17 March 2013 (UTC).

6th National Congress of the Communist Party of Vietnam

(

)

... that at the 6th National Congress of the Communist Party of Vietnam initiated the Doi Moi reforms which introduced a socialist-oriented market economy in Vietnam?

Created by --TIAYN (talk) 19:09, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

I reviewed "Historical nuclear weapons stockpiles and nuclear tests by country" DYK nom. --TIAYN (talk) 19:11, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Pervasive close paraphrasing to borderline copy-paste. This needs a major rewrite. Seems to have potential as an article, though. Abyssal (talk) 18:47, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
- You've done some good rewriting, but I'll have to be at school to access jstor. You may want to give the article another look-over for content close to the original article as I won't be able to give it the attention the review needs until Tuesday and you could preemptively undermine another delay to the nomination. Abyssal (talk) 22:12, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
  - Thats okay, next week (from monday to friday) I'll be gone doing military things (here in Norway, we don't have a professional army, strange.....) so thats okay.. I have time... But I can do some further changes. --TIAYN (talk) 10:27, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
    - I'll be waiting to proceed with the review when your military business is done. Good luck. Abyssal (talk) 16:31, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
      - I'm back. --TIAYN (talk) 06:51, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
        Sorry I haven't been active here, I've been busy IRL and with other less complicated DYK reviews. I'll be trying to take a look at this article again within a few days. Abyssal (talk) 16:52, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
        I'm going to go out on a limb and say that it looks like the close paraphrasing issues are okay now from what I see in both sources. Hook's ok. QPQ is fine. I'll pass this. Abyssal (talk) 18:59, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
I'm concerned that issues with close paraphrasing persist in this article. Compare for example "The party tried to reverse this decline by following three points, (1) to get party cadres to focus on technical economic and management responsibilities, (2) cadres were to be organized and get specialized training in economic and administrative fields to reequip them with information on how to run an increasingly complex economy, and (3) engineer a shift in the internal balance of power within the party" with "The Party's strategy for reversing this decline involved efforts to 1. focus party cadres on technical economic and management responsibilities; 2. organize and urge specialized training in economic and administrative fields to reequip cadres for the increasingly complex tasks of running the economic reform programmes; and 3. engineer shifts in the internal balance of organizational power within the Party". Nikkimaria (talk) 05:08, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

It's been two weeks since the above, and no action has been taken by the nominator to address still-problematic close paraphrasing. Closing the nomination. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:41, 17 March 2013 (UTC)