Template:Did you know nominations/Adam Fleming (businessman)
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 22:06, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Adam Fleming (businessman)
[edit]- ... that billionaire Adam Fleming is the nephew of James Bond novelist Ian Fleming?
- Reviewed: Abel Gonzales
Created by Edwardx (talk). Self-nominated at 22:57, 4 May 2015 (UTC).
- General eligibility:
- New enough:
- Long enough: - Character count is coming in at about 1412 right now.
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
Hook eligibility:
- Cited: - The hook does not appear to be cited in the article.
- Interesting:
QPQ: - Not done
Overall: A very interesting hook that caught my eye, but the character count and cites are an issue. Sorry that I'm having to ask this, but this is my first DYK review, and I don't know whether the length limits have to be met in the seven day period or whether they can be fulfilled afterwards. BenLinus1214talk 02:20, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for helping out with reviews. Since WP isn't a WP:BUREAUCRACY we do all we can to let a nom be successful. Therefore, if in the next coupla weeks Edwardx can bring the length up to par (it's now 1250 chars, so another 250 are needed), plus fix the other red Xs seen above, no problem. He should ping you when the article's ready for you to look at again. EEng (talk) 05:11, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
- BenLinus1214 and EEng Thanks. QPQ done. Article now long enough. Edwardx (talk) 10:27, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for helping out with reviews. Since WP isn't a WP:BUREAUCRACY we do all we can to let a nom be successful. Therefore, if in the next coupla weeks Edwardx can bring the length up to par (it's now 1250 chars, so another 250 are needed), plus fix the other red Xs seen above, no problem. He should ping you when the article's ready for you to look at again. EEng (talk) 05:11, 20 May 2015 (UTC)