Template:Did you know nominations/Aluchin (volcano)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:07, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Aluchin (volcano)

(

)

... that Aluchin may have formed about 1000 AD?

Reviewed: Jhabua-Ratlam Lok Sabha constituency by-election, 2015
Comment: The exact text of the source is The volcanoes are estimated to have formed around 1000 AD (Gorodinskiy and others, 1967). I am a bit uninspired at finding a WP:LIMITED compliant hook at the moment, so a better one may be needed.

Moved to mainspace by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk). Self-nominated at 11:54, 24 September 2016 (UTC).

. The article is new (created on 22 September) and long enough. It is interesting and within policies. Hook fact is verified by an (offline) inline citation. ~~My concern is the hook, which is not inline with WP:WEASEL. I think it should be reworded, for instance, by stating that it is a scholarly estimation, not a fact.~~ Borsoka (talk) 17:14, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
The hook is going to be tough - it's going to be hard to avoid a paraphrase. Maybe:
- ALT1: ... that it is estimated that around 1000 AD, in Russia Aluchin was born?
Attempting a bit of poesy here. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:44, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

. To be honest, I do not like this kind of poesy, but hook fact is now in line with WP:WEASEL, and taste is a really personal feature. :) Borsoka (talk) 01:25, 29 September 2016 (UTC)