Template:Did you know nominations/Aroma of Tacoma
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Relentlessly (talk) 08:18, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Aroma of Tacoma
[edit]- ... that the Aroma of Tacoma is a putrid odor associated with Tacoma, Washington?
Created by LavaBaron (talk). Self nominated at 17:09, 17 March 2015 (UTC).
The article is 1,464 prose bytes, thirty-six bytes short of 1,500-byte minimum requirement. A few more sentences will resolve this. However, I am not confident about its notability. Is merging to "Tacoma, Washington" article possible? George Ho (talk) 08:04, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks! I've updated the article and it should now have more than 1500 bytes. The article meets GNG, it is cited in references (as a topic in itself, not a brief aside in larger articles about the city of Tacoma), in the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, the Tacoma News Tribune, the Spokane Spokesman-Review, one trade journal (Pulp and Paper Magazine), and a peer-reviewed scholarly journal (Journal of Business and Economic Statistics) over a period of dates spanning 1988 to 2011, and I could fairly easily come-up with another dozen sources. LavaBaron (talk) 17:34, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Issue resolved; waiting for another reviewer. Still uncertain about the topic's notability though. George Ho (talk) 18:56, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
New reviewer here, with only 1 DYK previously, but I enjoy verifying and assessing writing. So I give qualified support to this DYK nomination: Article length:1611 characters; DYK nomination within 2 days of creation; no copyvio or plagiarism concerns. Meets GNG. Tacoma's aroma is well known and notable in the Pacific Northwest. While I agree this brief article could possibly be merged with Tacoma, Washington, there it would probably be perceived as giving undue weight to a negative perception of the city. It does stand on its own as a notable topic. I'm ambivalent, but favor support. — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 05:34, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
I second this nomination. It certainly meets GNG with its variety of state and national references, and even a scientific paper. I did a Google Books search and found the expression "Aroma of Tacoma" coming up again and again. I added a book chapter for further reading. Hook ref verified and cited inline. Good to go. Yoninah (talk) 22:30, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
