Template:Did you know nominations/Atsuko Tanaka (voice actress)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 11:26, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Atsuko Tanaka (voice actress)

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that voice actress Atsuko Tanaka often named pandas? Source: TBSラジオ「安住紳一郎の日曜天国」のパンダ命名企画にラジオネーム「完熟マンゴー」として電話出演したものの、安住アナに声でバレてしまった過去もある。また、アドベンチャーワールドのジャイアントパンダ「結浜（ゆいひん）」、「彩浜（さいひん）」の名付け親の1人となった。 /She appeared under the radio name "Kanjuku Mango" on the TBS Radio's "Azumi Shin'ichirō no Nichiyō Tengoku" for a panda-naming project ... She was also one of the godparents of the giant pandas "Yuihin" and "Saihin" at Adventure World.
  • ALT1: ... that voice actress Atsuko Tanaka was one of the godparents of two giant pandas at the Adventure World zoo? Source: As above
  • ALT2: ... that Nicole Kidman's Japanese dub actress Atsuko Tanaka once called herself "the one person in Japan who underst[ood] her acting the best"? Source: ニコール・キッドマンとはとても相性の良さを感じています。演じやすいというか。日本中で彼女のお芝居を一番理解しているのは自分だと自負しています（笑）。/I feel that I have a very good chemistry with Nicole Kidman. It's easy to act with her. I'm proud to say that I'm the person in Japan who understands her acting the best (laughs).
  • ALT3: ... that before her voice acting career, Atsuko Tanaka worked as a background extra for Shochiku while studying at Ferris University? Source: 大船の松竹撮影所が近かったので夏休みに演劇部仲間とエキストラのアルバイトをしていて、岩下志麻さんをお見かけした時はテンションが上がりました。/The Shochiku Ofuna studios were nearby, so during the summer holidays I worked part-time as an extra with my friends from the drama club [at Ferris University, and I got really excited when I saw Shima Iwashita.]
  • ALT4: ... that Atsuko Tanaka turned to voice acting because she found it unreasonable to work as an office lady until retirement? Source: これから定年までOLをし続けるのって無理だって思いました...そして、安定はしていなくても、好きな仕事に就けたなら、やりがいもあるし、一生続けていけるんじゃないかなあと考え始めたわけです。―そんなとき、声優の仕事と出逢ったんですね。/TANAKA: I realized that it would be impossible for me to continue working as an office lady until retirement ... Then I started to think that even if it wasn't stable, if I could get a job I liked, it would be rewarding and I could do it for the rest of my life. [... INTERVIEWER: And that's when you discovered voice acting.]
  • ALT5: ... that voice actress Atsuko Tanaka originally worked as an office lady in Tokyo? Source: 横浜で大学を卒業し、東京で民間企業の事務職に就いた。/I graduated from university in Yokohama and got a job as an office worker at a private company in Tokyo. + こういうやくざなことからは足を洗うんだと、OLになりました。/I decided to get away from all that rough stuff and became an office lady.
  • ALT6: ... that although her parents initially disapproved of Atsuko Tanaka's voice acting career, they reconsidered after she starred in a Lupin the Third television special? Source: ルパン三世のヒロイン役で両親公認に ... OLを辞めて声優になると宣言したとき、ご家族の反応は？猛反対でした ... 1993年、30歳のとき、「ルパン三世ルパン暗殺指令」という作品のヒロインに抜擢していただきました。これはテレビでのオンエアですから、両親も見てくれたようです。/Approved by parents for the role of the heroine in Lupin III ... What was your family's reaction when you announced that you were going to quit your office job to become a voice actress? He was strongly against it ... In 1993, when I was 30 years old, I was chosen to play the heroine in the film "Lupin III: Orders to Assassinate Lupin." This was broadcast on television, so my parents also watched it.
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Ban Hyo-jin
  • Comment: Expanded from 1126 (18 August) to 6336 (23 August, when almost all the expansion took place). There is an ITN nom (albeit improved a little too late; the section hadn't been updated in days when it was added), but it's recent deaths so should be fine.

5x expanded by Miraclepine (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 52 past nominations.

ミラP@Miraclepine 16:20, 26 August 2024 (UTC).

• Article has been tagged "Primary sources" since August - since we're now at the end of September, I don't think it's likely to be fixed.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:16, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

• Changed to the "?no" template, as I see that talk page discussion is ongoing. Hopefully this gets resolved soon.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:19, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

• @Crisco 1492: Yes, I told the editor who added the tag that I should have the issue resolved and asked them if I can remove it per WP:BRD. ミラP@Miraclepine 23:30, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

• Alrighty. I've got this nomination watchlisted, so I'll come back in a couple days and see how things are going (personally, I've always believed that interviews published in reliable sources are still fact checked, and even self-published primary sources are accepted for non-controversial things, but...) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:41, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

• Upon checking, LeónGonsalvesofGoa (whom I'm informing of this DYK) hasn't edited in the past five days. Should I give them a few (maybe three) days before I let someone else decide on the tag or would it be more practical to skip straight to the latter? I'm leaning the latter because I want this done quickly, but I feel the former is more courteous since I asked them anyway (earlier today I might add). ミラP@Miraclepine 03:10, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

• Okay, LeónGonsalvesofGoa has finally removed the tag per their talk page reply, so it's safe to say we're making great progress. ミラP@Miraclepine 03:30, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article is new enough, 5x expansion on August 22nd. Appeared in ITN, but as an RD, which per WP:DYKNEW does not disqualify the article. Earwig's does not check for plagiarism in foreign-language sources, but based on Google Translate, I don't see any paraphrasing / copyright issues. I prefer the panda hooks (and note that the source indicates that she was identified by the host, which is hilarious).  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 09:57, 25 September 2024 (UTC)