Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Bhalchandra Dattatray Mondhe

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 22:32, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Bhalchandra Dattatray Mondhe

[edit]

Created by Lourdes (talk). Self-nominated at 11:49, 2 September 2016 (UTC).

 • No issues found with article, ready for human review.

    • This article is new and was created on 09:44, 02 September 2016 (UTC)
    • This article meets the DYK criteria at 4112 characters
    • All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
    • This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
    • ? A copyright violation is suspected by an automated tool, with 27.5% confidence. (confirm)
      • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.

 • Some overall issues detected

    • The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 85 characters
    • The hook ALT1 is an appropriate length at 127 characters
    • Lourdes has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review is required for this nomination.

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 18:00, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

  • Full review needed by human reviewer now that QPQ has been submitted. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:41, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  • This article is new enough and long enough. The ALT1 hook has inline citations and is acceptable, the article is neutral, and I detected no policy issues. The original hook seems to imply he was responsible for reviving the lake singlehandedly whereas, as I understand it, he co-founded The Nature Volunteers Club, and worked with two other people to improve the lake environment, so I suggest we go with ALT1. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:40, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Cwmhiraeth thank you. Yes, you are right in the view of the original hook. I had not realized the perspective. Thanks for the passing. Lourdes 17:03, 24 September 2016 (UTC)