Template:Did you know nominations/Boston and Skegness (UK Parliament constituency)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 20:58, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Boston and Skegness (UK Parliament constituency)

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that Boston and Skegness was estimated to have the highest percentage of leave voters of any UK constituency in the 2016 EU Referendum? Source: House of Commons Library
  • ALT1:... that a town in the constituency of Boston and Skegness has been described as Britain's unofficial Brexit capital? Source: BBC News "Boston is Britain's unofficial Brexit capital..."
  • ALT2:... that in 2018, just 19.7% of adults in the Boston and Skegness constituency had a Higher National Diploma or a degree-level qualification? Source: Office of National Statistics (archived) "Qualifications (Jan 2018-Dec 2018): Boston and Skegness (%), 19.7"
  • ALT3:... that part of the Boston and Skegness constituency has the highest level of Eastern European immigrants in England and Wales? Source: The Guardian "...Boston was now home to a higher proportion of eastern European immigrants than anywhere else in England and Wales."
  • ALT4:... that at the 2019 General Election, the constituency of Boston and Skegness was the second-safest Conservative seat in Britain, despite the fact that it was almost lost to Labour 18 years previously? Sources: House of Commons Library, p.73 The Almanac of British Politics (7th ed), p.158

• Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Noosha Fox
• Comment: Improved to Good Article status on 6 May, nominated on 10 May.

Improved to Good Article status by N Oneemuss (talk). Nominated by PinkPanda272 (talk) at 08:20, 10 May 2020 (UTC).

• Y Article is long enough (19355 characters), is a GA, nominated in time (became GA on 6 May, nominated 10 May), and article is within policy
• Y ALT0, ALT1, ALT4 are all short enough, interesting and well cited and within policy. I don't think ALT2 is appropriate (why would we want to highlight possible deprivation), and ALT3 isn't that interesting either in my opinion. Happy for ALT0, ALT1 or ALT4 to be run
• Y QPQ done
• Overall, this nomination passes, congratulations. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:39, 13 May 2020 (UTC)