The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:56, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
ALT1:... that ...? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
The article still has a couple of {{cn}} tags. These need to be addressed before it is passes. Also make some wiki-links in the last paras, examples include, Pleistocene, Gambia, Genetic analysis etc. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:54, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Happy to sign off on this. Article received 5x expansion within the requisite timeframe. No issues with copyvios that I can find. Neutrally written, and the issue with citations has been addressed. QPQ is complete. Nice job with the hook: I actually chuckled as I read it. Cited inline, supported by the source. Not overwhelmed by the source itself, but for "usage in aviculture" it's alright, IMO. Vanamonde (talk) 03:23, 28 November 2016 (UTC)