Template:Did you know nominations/CSL Plasma

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PrimalMustelid talk 16:44, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

CSL Plasma

(

)

... that medical staff at CSL Plasma often donate plasma in their free time? Source (Subscription needed), Source
- ALT1: ... that per CSL Plasma policy, plasma collected from first-time donors cannot be used until a second donation is given? Source
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Stephanie of Courtenay

Created by Johnson524 (talk). Self-nominated at 18:45, 3 March 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/CSL Plasma; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

New enough and long enough. QPQ present. Have to AGF on the South Florida Business Journal source. I can't take ALT1 as it is cited exclusively to a primary source. Actually, Johnson524 I'd rather see more secondary sourcing in the article, especially for the "claims to be" to primary source in sentence 1 and the first two sections. See if you can't find anything in WP:TWL databases, either. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 18:40, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Sammi Brie: OK, should be done now! The Wikipedia Library was super helpful, what do you think? Johnson524 15:20, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Johnson524: Coming along here. I have a couple of new issues:
  - You should clip Newspapers.com citations for use. Always. I did this for all except one citation I do not think is RS: the StatePoint Media article. Their website indicates, Additionally, we work with various non-profit and for-profit organizations — and include their experts in some, but not all, of our stories where it makes sense editorially. They pay us for such inclusion in those stories. Another website of theirs says, StatePoint Media, a leading sponsored editorial content service, connects brands with consumers through the mass readership of local online & print media outlets our clients are not reaching. Is there a better source than this for those claims?
  - One other item, and this comes from personal experience: "transgenderism" is not a neutral word, not with an -ism attached, and should be avoided. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 17:25, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
    - @Sammi Brie: Thanks for the additional feedback! I have removed the StatePoint source and the word "transgenderism", which I didn't know wasn't neutral, sorry about that 😅 Are we good to go now? Johnson524 21:30, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
      - Looks like it now, but still only for ALT0. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 00:44, 28 March 2024 (UTC)