Template:Did you know nominations/Chants for Socialists
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 12:56, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Chants for Socialists
[edit]- ... that Chants for Socialists is an album by Darren Hayman based on the 19th-century protest poetry of William Morris?
- Reviewed: Neal Howard
Created by Dennisthemonkeychild (talk). Self-nominated at 11:17, 7 May 2015 (UTC).
- New enough (created May 6), long enough, no copyvio or close paraphrasing evident, QPQ done, hook statement is directly cited and checks out in the Guardian article. One minor point: is citation 1 misformatted, or was the same review published in two places? Currently ref 1 and 12 both say
Horton, Matthew. "NME Reviews".
but ref 1 is for Uncut magazine and ref 12 is for NME. - Worth noting: my first DYK review. Opabinia regalis (talk) 04:15, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you for your review, the Uncut review was indeed wrong, well spotted and thank you. I have corrected title and author name, all is now in order with the references. Dennisthemonkeychild (talk) 15:47, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for checking; good to go! Opabinia regalis (talk) 21:03, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you for your review, the Uncut review was indeed wrong, well spotted and thank you. I have corrected title and author name, all is now in order with the references. Dennisthemonkeychild (talk) 15:47, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
- New enough (created May 6), long enough, no copyvio or close paraphrasing evident, QPQ done, hook statement is directly cited and checks out in the Guardian article. One minor point: is citation 1 misformatted, or was the same review published in two places? Currently ref 1 and 12 both say