Template:Did you know nominations/Confederación Nacional de Organizaciones Populares
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:52, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Confederación Nacional de Organizaciones Populares
[edit]- ... that in 2015, the National Confederation of Popular Organizations moved to a new headquarters described as the "most sinister building" in Mexico?
- ALT1:... that the National Confederation of Popular Organizations was a "loyal creature" of the Mexican executive branch?
- Reviewed: Charles Koch Institute
Created by Raymie (talk). Self-nominated at 07:28, 24 July 2016 (UTC).
No issues found with article, ready for human review.
- ✓ This article is new and was created on 07:03, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
- ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 3015 characters
- ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
- ✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
- ✓ A copyright violation is unlikely (3.8% confidence; confirm)
- Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
- No overall issues detected
- ✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 142 characters
- ✓ The hook ALT1 is an appropriate length at 108 characters
- ✓ Raymie has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review of Template:Did you know nominations/Charles Koch Institute was performed for this nomination.
Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This bot is experimental; please report any issues. This is not a substitute for a human review. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 22:56, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
Source to a RS Spanish-language source that says what it cite. Everything else is correct as per DYKBot's review. This review requires a second pass as per a decision in ANI. GTG. LavaBaron (talk) 02:23, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
This article is new enough and long enough. I prefer ALT0 for which the hook fact is cited, the article is neutral and I cannot assess whether there are any policy issues. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:37, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
