Template:Did you know nominations/Death (Melanie Martinez song)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 18:27, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Death (Melanie Martinez song)
- ... that Melanie Martinez's song, "Death", was her first chart hit in over a decade? Source: https://www.latestly.com/socially/entertainment/death-by-melanie-martinez-debuts-at-95-on-the-hot-100-it-marks-her-first-latest-tweet-by-pop-crave-5000263.html https://www.billboard.com/artist/melanie-martinez/chart-history/hsi/
- Reviewed: Vylet Pony
Converted from a redirect by JuanGLP (talk). Self-nominated at 18:23, 28 March 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Death (Melanie Martinez song); consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
Original: "... that Melanie Martinez's song, "Death", debuts at #95 on the Billboard Hot 100, making it her first appearance since her time on The Voice?"ALT 1: "... that Melanie Martinez's song, "Death", was her first chart hit over a decade, since The Voice?"- ALT 2: "... that Melanie Martinez's song, "Death", was her first chart hit in over a decade?"
ALT 3: "... that Melanie Martinez's song, "Death", was her first chart hit on the Billboard Hot 100, over a decade?"
There is a maintenance tag on the "Music video" section. Also, I'm not sure the hook is particularly catching, charting at number 95 is not a significant achievement (compared to, say, top five). Maybe instead have a hook that says it was her first chart hit in over a decade? Also, a QPQ is required. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:26, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Ritchie333, I do not know what's a QPQ, and I have put three alternatives. If you would like to give it a try, add one. — JuanGLP (talk + contribs) 22:05, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- QPQ is "Quid pro quo" ie: review a nomination when you add a new one, although I see you've now done this. I like ALT2 the best. There's still the issue of the "unsourced" tag on the article. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:35, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Ritchie333, I changed the hook and the "unsourced" tag has been fixed. — JuanGLP (talk + contribs) 14:47, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Okay, that should be sufficient to get on the main page now. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:05, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Ritchie333, I changed the hook and the "unsourced" tag has been fixed. — JuanGLP (talk + contribs) 14:47, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- QPQ is "Quid pro quo" ie: review a nomination when you add a new one, although I see you've now done this. I like ALT2 the best. There's still the issue of the "unsourced" tag on the article. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:35, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Ritchie333, I do not know what's a QPQ, and I have put three alternatives. If you would like to give it a try, add one. — JuanGLP (talk + contribs) 22:05, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
@JuanGLP and Ritchie333: The hook is cited in the nomination but not in the article. Also should the hook (ALT2) have the word "in" over a decade?
