Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Derrick Kindred

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:42, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Derrick Kindred

[edit]

2x expanded and sourced (BLP) by Tim1965 (talk). Self-nominated at 22:30, 31 August 2016 (UTC).

 • No issues found with article, ready for human review.

    • This biographical article has been expanded from 213 chars to 2077 chars since 03:39, 10 June 2016 (UTC), a 9.75-fold expansion
    • This article meets the DYK criteria at 2077 characters
    • All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
    • This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
    • A copyright violation is unlikely according to automated metrics (8.3% confidence; confirm)
      • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.

 • No overall issues detected

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 00:41, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

  • Interesting fact and verified with not one, but two sources. The bot review indicates that the other criteria has been met. I believe this is good to go.--12george1 (talk) 16:42, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Article (New):
  • Article (Long enough):
  • Article (Within policy):
  • Hook (Format):
  • Hook (Content):
  • QPQ:
  • Images:
My personal investigation has unsurprisingly come to the same conclusion as the Bot. Good to go! --Coin945 (talk) 16:59, 14 September 2016 (UTC)