Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/El Eternauta: segunda parte

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Rjjiii talk 16:29, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

El Eternauta: segunda parte

  • Source: Alfredo Serra (July 22, 2019). "La trágica historia del hombre que creó El Eternauta: el más audaz e inolvidable de los cómics argentinos" [The tragic story of the man who created the Eternaut: the boldest and unforgettable Argentine comic] (in Spanish). Infobae. Retrieved August 9, 2024.
Moved to mainspace by Cambalachero (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 122 past nominations.

Cambalachero (talk) 17:49, 9 August 2024 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article looks good. My only concern is the hook states that it was while writing the story, whereas the article says he was a victim of an enforced disappearance shortly after ending the story. Thoughts on this? BeanieFan11 (talk) 00:12, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

  • Done. The problem was that I started writing "on the fly", and by logic, if the story is completed (the comic itself is) he must have been kidnapped after finishing it. And yet, it happened a year earlier. I then corrected the article when I realized that and sought sources with more detail, but I forgot to update the lead. As for the proposed ALT1, that doesn't seem like better wording to me. "Murdered" (a public figure by a national government) would suggest something more visible and/or public, like a firing squad execution, and just "disappeared" sounds like a magic trick. A hook should be understood on its own, without any other context at all. "enforced disappearance" is more precise and does not leave space for misunderstandings. Cambalachero (talk) 04:30, 11 August 2024 (UTC)