The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 23:26, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Overall: This article and hook satisfy all DYK criteria. The article became a GA on March 21, so it is new enough. It's certainly long enough. It features in-line citations with verifiable references. No copyvio detected via Earwig. Hook is sourced in-line and verifiable and is interesting. On the longer side for a DYK but within the 200-character limit. QPQ has been completed. Nice work! Topshelver (talk) 21:33, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
This article and hook satisfy all DYK criteria. The article became a GA on March 21, so it is new enough. It's certainly long enough. It features in-line citations with verifiable references. No copyvio detected via Earwig. Hook is sourced in-line and verifiable and is interesting. On the longer side for a DYK but within the 200-character limit. QPQ has been completed. Nice work! Topshelver (talk) 21:33, 23 March 2021 (UTC)