The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Overall: New enough and long enough, well-written, neutral and seems free of plagiarism (Earwig stands at 35.1% but that's mostly due to proper nouns like names of the batteries, military units etc). Hook cited and interesting, and QPQ done. Looks good to go to me. Having written a number of articles about the fortifications of Malta myself, I found the article quite interesting - well done! Xwejnusgozo (talk) 09:37, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I came by to promote this, and while the article is interesting, the hook is not. A fortress was named after a harbor? This is not "hooky" enough to reel in readers to click on the link. Please say something catchy about the fortress itself. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 11:48, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
Nice. @Xwejnusgozo: would you review this alt please? Yoninah (talk) 19:48, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
I had originally approved this on the basis that "fortress" tends to refer to a single fortification rather than a network of fortifications spread out on a relatively large area. However, I agree that the new hook is better, and it seems OK since it's cited, interesting and included in the article. Seems good to go. Xwejnusgozo (talk) 11:35, 3 June 2020 (UTC)