Template:Did you know nominations/Get Married 3
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 23:20, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Get Married 3
[edit]- ... that Get Married 3 featured characters named after Mark Zuckerberg, Oprah Winfrey, and Hanung Bramantyo?
- ALT1:... that Hanung Bramantyo was called an extra in Get Married 3 after directing the first two?
- Reviewed: Megane (film)
Created/expanded by Crisco 1492 (talk). Self nom at 15:21, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
First thing, I prefer the original hook, not ALT1. Second, I'm all set to pass this for age, length, hook and online ref, however I don't get the citation style, which truncates the titles of the references to an odd degree -- prefer to see a comprehensible amount of the title or none at all (given you also have author and year, the second option should be workable). Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 09:46, 8 June 2012 (UTC)- They are clickable footnotes using {{sfn}}, limited to the first three words of the title. All my featured articles, including the one on the film Ruma Maida, use the same system. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:28, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
- As a second note, removing the title from the footnotes would cause problems further down the line should another source by the same author be used (case in point, both articles by Benke). How much of a title would be "comprehensible" in your opinion? Quoting the whole title "Minggu Ini, "Get Married 3" Pengumpul Penonton Terbanyak", for example, would probably be too much. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:45, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
- Interesting, but in all my FAC reviewing and delegate duties I've never noticed that. I agree the clickable thingy is useful, I just find seeing three words only to be distracting. For instance. it looked particularly odd to see "A moving yet" when just another two words would give you the full title "A moving yet funny comedy". In the example you quote above, "Minggu Ini" would do the trick. I guess what I was hoping to see was a "short title" format. Not possible? Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 13:15, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
- How's it look now? Trimmed / expanded to end with nouns. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:35, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
