Template:Did you know nominations/HTMS Sri Ayudhya

  The following is an archived discussion of HTMS Sri Ayudhya's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination's (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the DYK WikiProject's (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 22:37, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

HTMS Sri Ayudhya

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that the Thai Army, Police and Air Force sank the Navy's flagship HTMS Sri Ayudhya (sister ship pictured), despite Prime Minister Plaek Pibulsonggram being held hostage on board?

• Reviewed: Mathura Kaliamman Temple, Siruvachur

5x expanded by Paul 012 (talk). Self nom at 19:54, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

• Date, size are fine. However the article uses non-English refs, and does not use end-of-sentence cites, including for the sentences related to the hook. As I cannot verify that the hook is in the ref claimed, and I am not trusting end-of-para refs, I cannot pass it unless end-of-sentence cites are added. Another reviewer may pass it if they wish or if they can verify the hook. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 20:27, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

• Ref #5,[1] which is in English and accessible via Google Books, covers basically everything in the hook. I couldn't find a single sentence with which to associate the hook since it's practically a summary of the whole paragraph. I could move the ref tag around, if you have specific suggestions. --Paul_012 (talk) 20:35, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

• Would you mind adding the end-of-sentence cites at least to the para which discusses the events mentioned in the hook? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 21:59, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

• Okay. Usually I don't see the point in repeating the same in-line refs for every sentence, but since two are now used in the paragraph clarification seems reasonable. --Paul_012 (talk) 22:20, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

• Thanks, GTG now. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:43, 2 February 2013 (UTC)