Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/House of Cards (season 2)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 07:21, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

House of Cards (season 2)

[edit]

Created by TonyTheTiger (talk). Self nominated at 01:35, 4 October 2013 (UTC).

  • Date, size are fine, but the hook and refs are a fail. The ref for the hook claim is [1] but that article does not mention Johnson at all. Please provide a correct reference. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:14, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Comment - it seems much of this article talks about season 1 and its reception. If that was removed, namely the first two paragraphs of the "background" section, there would be little left. Similarly, much of that material is an almost word-for-word copy of material in the main series article. While I have a lot of respect for Tony, this DYK seems a little "fish in the barrel" and not-so-grrrrreat. Chaosdruid (talk) 00:31, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
  • I am expanding this article in response to your comments. It likely meets DYK requirements now. I am still expanding though. I will probably have some ALT hooks after I finish expanding.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 15:51, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
I believe I am finished expanding the article based on current media content.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 21:32, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
(ALT1) that since the Maryland State House is not rentable, producers of season 2 of House of Cards made various donations in order to use the building for filming.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 21:32, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Article and ALT1 need reviewing due to recent expansion and new hook proposal. Past issues should be checked in the process; note that reused material must be expanded 5x according to DYK rules. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:33, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Length/expansion (not much was reused in this version and it easily passes the expansion requirement), NPOV, date, and sources check out and hook is cited. It's a pretty comprehensive article for a season that's not even out yet. Should be good to go. Thingg 04:37, 9 November 2013 (UTC)