Template:Did you know nominations/Hybia Valley Airport

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:25, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Hybia Valley Airport

(

)

... that the Hybla Valley Airport was the first licensed airport in Virginia?

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Herbert L. Packer

Created by Doug Coldwell (talk). Self-nominated at 14:54, 5 July 2016 (UTC).

Note: Page is named Hybla Valley Airport. I adjusted the credit line to reflect the correct spelling. Yoninah (talk) 18:00, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

No issues found with article, ready for human review.
- ✓ This article is new and was created on 14:48, 05 July 2016 (UTC)
- ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 3677 characters
- ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
- ✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
- ✓ The probability of copyright violation is 9.1%. (confirm)
  - Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
Some overall issues detected
- ✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 70 characters
- ✗ This is Doug Coldwell's 279th nomination. A QPQ review is required for this nomination.
  - ✗ Template:Did you know nominations/Herbert L. Packer appears to have been used as QPQ for Template:Did you know nominations/Taillefer (Strauss), Template:Did you know nominations/Hybia Valley Airport

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This bot is experimental; please report any issues. This is not a substitute for a human review. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 19:23, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

First QPQ was for review of ALT2 for a re-review. Additional QPQ done anyway, to make sure its covered - Template:Did you know nominations/Ina Plug --Doug Coldwell (talk) 19:29, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

@Intelligentsium: The bot is incorrect; a QPQ could have been done by two reviewers, as in this case. The additional QPQ is nice, but not necessary. Yoninah (talk) 21:11, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

I'll throw in the extra QPQ to boot and to help out on getting articles reviewed.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 21:31, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

No issues found with article, ready for human review.

Review Timely nomination of new article. New enough. Long enough. Earwig copy violation detector gives it a clean bill. No close paraphrasing. No Copy vios. Hook is interesting and hooky. Every paragraph is cited. Supported by several in line WP:RS, WP:QPQ Satisfied. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 19:55, 9 July 2016 (UTC)