Template:Did you know nominations/Incitement to terrorism
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:41, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Incitement to terrorism
- ... that some types of incitement to terrorism are constitutionally protected in the United States? Source: Weinstein, James (2011). "An Overview of American Free Speech Doctrine". In Hare, Ivan; Weinstein, James (eds.). Extreme Speech and Democracy. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-172067-3.
Created by Buidhe (talk). Self-nominated at 03:59, 19 May 2020 (UTC).
Article is new enough and long enough (it was technically created May 15, not May 19, but still nominated within the required timeframe). No copyvio issues: the article relies heavily on quoted text, but everything is properly cited and indicated as such. Hook content has an inline citation, and I've confirmed that the source info supports it. The hook is short enough and definitely interesting, but I wonder: would it be more accurate to say that "some types" of incitement to terrorism are constitutionally protected, rather than "many types"? The article does not specify exactly how many types are protected. I also note that the nominator's QPQ is not quite complete (they queried an issue in their initial DYK review, and have not yet responded to the nom's changes). Alanna the Brave (talk) 20:04, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Alanna the Brave: Thanks for the review. I have edited the hook as requested and have replied on the other nomination (Wikipedia:Did_you_know#QPQ actually does not say anything about follow up assuming the initial review is carried out correctly.) buidhe 20:48, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
Perfect! Thanks Buidhe -- your DYK hook looks good to go now. I know the rules don't specify an obligatory QPQ followup, but I think it's good practice to follow through with a DYK review after you've initially queried an issue (otherwise, it just ends up adding to the backlog of unapproved noms). Cheers, Alanna the Brave (talk) 21:32, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
