Template:Did you know nominations/Insulting a monument
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 01:39, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Profaning a monument
.jpg)
Rainbow flag on the statue of Maria Konopnicka in Kraków
- ... that in Poland, hanging a rainbow flag on a statue (pictured) may be a crime? Source: https://dorzeczy.pl/kraj/150333/poznanska-prokuratura-teczowa-flaga-nie-zniewaza-pomnikow.html (also see below)
- ALT1:... that three LGBT activists who hung rainbow flags over statues in Warsaw (copycat pictured) were arrested for insulting monuments? Source: https://www.pri.org/stories/2020-08-19/polish-activists-fight-against-anti-lgbt-movement https://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2020/08/07/world/europe/07reuters-poland-lgbt.html
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/A. T. Q. Stewart
- Comment:
Wish I had a free image for this, sadly not.Image has been found.
Created by Buidhe (talk). Self-nominated at 07:05, 24 August 2020 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
- Other problems:
- There are open maintenance banners on the page now, unfortunately.
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
Either of the hooks is good to go. epicgenius (talk) 19:01, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Epicgenius: Thanks for the review. I found an image, can you approve it? Thanks! (t · c) buidhe 20:38, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
No problem. The image is also good. epicgenius (talk) 22:03, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Please see the article's talk page. It may not be stable yet, and may need globalizaiton. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:18, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
The author made the article on a global subject only cover Poland, then started deleting any efforts to globalize. The article was also created when this is a political controversy in Poland so this looks like a WP:RGW.T Magierowski (talk) 13:41, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- The article is only about the law in Poland. Content about other jurisdictions was added without regard to sources which actually draw a connection between them in breach of WP:OR (implying that the laws cover the same offense, without any source saying so). I have removed original research from the article because it violates core content policy. (t · c) buidhe 16:20, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- I disagree, but let's keep the discussion in one place (article's talk page). That said, the article is not stable right now and saw some major additions and reverts yesterday. This nomination should be put on hold for a few days at least until the article is stable and not tagged. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:07, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
There are open maintenance banners on the page now, unfortunately - specifically globalize & neutrality - so I have to reopen this nomination for now. Please do ping me when these issues have been resolved, though. epicgenius (talk) 14:51, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- I disagree, but let's keep the discussion in one place (article's talk page). That said, the article is not stable right now and saw some major additions and reverts yesterday. This nomination should be put on hold for a few days at least until the article is stable and not tagged. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:07, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Epicgenius, They have. (t · c) buidhe 12:52, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Buidhe: all right. The maintenance tags just have to be removed, and then this is good to go. epicgenius (talk) 15:35, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
- Sadly I have no control over other editors re-inserting maintenance tags that do not belong in the article after the original complaint has been resolved (creation of an overview at laws protecting monuments by country, so that you cannot complain that this article lacks a worldwide view). (t · c) buidhe 22:19, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry for not getting back to this, I totally forgot. Looks good to go now that all issues have been resolved. epicgenius (talk) 17:28, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry for not getting back to this, I totally forgot.
- Sadly I have no control over other editors re-inserting maintenance tags that do not belong in the article after the original complaint has been resolved (creation of an overview at laws protecting monuments by country, so that you cannot complain that this article lacks a worldwide view). (t · c) buidhe 22:19, 13 September 2020 (UTC)