Template:Did you know nominations/Ius civile vigilantibus scriptum est

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 12:37, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Ius civile vigilantibus scriptum est

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that variations of the Latin legal maxim ius civile vigilantibus scriptum est have been used by American, European and Lesothan courts? Source: http://local.droit.ulg.ac.be/sa/rida/file/2013/17.Willems.pdf [German source, p. 342, 343]
  The hook can additionally be verified in English by looking at the individual citations given in the article.
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Jesse Marcel (review is ongoning)

Moved to mainspace by WatkynBassett (talk). Self-nominated at 17:57, 22 April 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Ius civile vigilantibus scriptum est; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

• Long enough, new enough when nominated, cites good sources, Earwig only picks up the Latin. The lengthy English translation is borderline but I think it is ok. QPQ has been done. Hook is cited and interesting. Good to go. —Kusma (talk) 12:38, 13 May 2023 (UTC)