Template:Did you know nominations/Kathleen Garman
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 00:05, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Kathleen Garman
[edit]- ... that Kathleen Garman was shot by sculptor Jacob Epstein's wife in 1923, had three children with him, and eventually married him in 1955?
- Reviewed: The Thirteenth Tale (film)
- Comment: Expanded as part of the Bloomsbury Group editathon, 19 October 2013
5x expanded by Edwardx (talk), Philafrenzy (talk). Nominated by Edwardx (talk) at 21:51, 24 October 2013 (UTC).
- 5x expansion verified. New enough, long enough, adequately sourced. QPQ done. Hook is interesting and hook ref verified. I removed several instances of close paraphrasing in the article; the text looks OK now. I added some "citation needed" tags to material that requires a source. It also isn't clear whether the image is public domain outside the United States; the image has not yet been copied to Commons. Yoninah (talk) 22:22, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- It's been 20 days, and despite talk page notification the article has not been edited, and retains citation needed tags. This is one of several nominations from around this time that have been effectively abandoned by this nominator, so it's time to close it without further delay. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:02, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
- Review please. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:08, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
- Citations are all in order. Meets all criteria, as in original review above. I think the hook works much better as the last, "quirky" hook in the set, so I removed "(pictured)". Good to go. Yoninah (talk) 13:10, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- I just checked it too, can confirm it is o.k. I think the picture is not usable: fair use but not public domain. It was taken in 1921 but there is no evidence it was published in the US or anywhere else before 1923, or that the author cannot be tracked down. It is on the cover of a recently published book, and it looks as if the credit is given on page ix, not visible to me. Aymatth2 (talk) 13:21, 25 November 2013 (UTC)