Template:Did you know nominations/Long Live the Royals

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Antony–22 (^talk⁄_contribs) 03:55, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Long Live the Royals

(

)

~~... that the announcement of the upcoming Long Live the Royals miniseries followed the creator's winning of a Primetime Emmy Award for its pilot?~~

ALT1:~~... that one critic posited that the success of Over the Garden Wall led to the commissioning of Long Live the Royals as a miniseries?~~
Reviewed: Byzantine units of measurement

Created by 23W (talk). Self-nominated at 00:06, 4 May 2015 (UTC).

, QPQ done, article of accepted length, cited article and hook, successfuly expanded 5 times, article is neutral and passes other required policies. RRD13 দেবজ্যোতি (talk) 09:03, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Haven't provided a QPQ yet—will do soon. Thanks for the review. 23W 03:52, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

@Royroydeb: QPQ now done; thank you for your patience. 23W 17:47, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

New reviewer needed to check QPQ, and also to recheck the rest, since RRD13 so clearly messed up on the QPQ aspect and may have equally inaccurate on other issues as well. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:54, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

I've tweaked the grammar and made a few small adjustments, checked length, dates, proper citations, and so on and it's all fine. Why no green check mark? The hooks. I don't like either one. The main hook is technically true, in that February 2015 follows August 2014, but the two events are not as directly connected as the hook implies. ALT1 is also true, but very dull. I propose ALT2, below.

ALT2: ... that the 9-minute pilot for Long Live the Royals won its creator a Primetime Emmy Award and earned the show an order from Cartoon Network? - Dravecky (talk) 12:01, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Reviewer needed to check ALT2. I've struck both the original hook and ALT1 due to the above objections. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:44, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Ok hang on - age and size (just) ok. Hook for ALT2 is sourced and faithful to source. Earwigs tool negative for copyvio. Scanning other sources indicates material legitimate...good to go. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:09, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, all. I think ALT2 is much better as well. 23W 22:19, 5 July 2015 (UTC)