Template:Did you know nominations/Microsoft v. Shah

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 ^talk 00:57, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Microsoft v. Shah

(

)

... that one can be sued for encouraging others to cybersquat on a trademarked domain name?

Created/expanded by Frgx (talk). Nominated by Neilc (talk) at 23:06, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Hopefully the "5 days old" rule is not enforced 100% strictly: the article was created 8 days ago, but we finished copy editing it 4 days ago (Oct. 21). Neilc (talk) 23:14, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

If you only finished expanding it 4 days after it was created and it was created 8 days ago (in context), then it's 4 days old so there no need to worry about it although you placed it in the wrong area, you should have placed it in the section that covers the day on which it was made (ie. 17th of October). That being said; date, length and hook are all OK. Good to go. The C of E. God Save The Queen! (talk) 19:38, 2 November 2012 (UTC)