The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:07, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
... that non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is the most common liver disorder worldwide and is present in approximately 25% of the world's population? Source: "Meta-analysis of studies using imaging modalities for diagnosis has confirmed NAFLD as the commonest liver disease worldwide affecting approximately 25% of the global population." [1]
ALT1:... that non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is the most common liver disorder worldwide and a leading cause of chronic liver disease? Source: "Meta-analysis of studies using imaging modalities for diagnosis has confirmed NAFLD as the commonest liver disease worldwide affecting approximately 25% of the global population." [2], "NAFLD is one of the most important causes of liver disease worldwide and will probably emerge as the leading cause of end-stage liver disease in the coming decades, with the disease affecting both adults and children." [3]
Reviewed: If I understood the DYK rules correctly, I am exempt from the QPQ rule since I have fewer than five DYK credits.
Comment: Article promoted to Good Article status on April 17th, 2020. This is an extremely common yet underappreciated disorder with significant adverse health effects that is often overlooked since it is frequently asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic. This is further solidified by the fact that this disorder affects ~25% of the globe and the page does not currently get a lot of views from Wikipedia readers (only ~575/day [4]). This is my first DYK nomination ever so please bear with me if I made a mistake, just let me know and I will fix it.
Comment: I do not know why the numbers 60, 61 and 62 are showing up in your nomination, because the ref numbers in the article are currently 13 (Marjot) and 14 (Younossi). I suppose you could have just put the ref #s and names in the DYK, but don't bother to change it now. David notMD (talk) 21:46, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
I'm not sure why it's showing up like that. It's different on this page than on the main DYK page. Strange. I figured people would click on the link. I've never done a DYK before as above. TylerDurden8823 (talk) 22:04, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
QPQ: - Not required, as this is editors' first DYK
Overall: Nice Good Article on a complicated topic! Both hooks confirmed by citations. I prefer the first. David notMD (talk) 18:59, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- Not required, as this is editors' first DYK
Nice Good Article on a complicated topic! Both hooks confirmed by citations. I prefer the first. David notMD (talk) 18:59, 24 April 2020 (UTC)