Template:Did you know nominations/Occupational epidemiology
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:25, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Occupational epidemiology
[edit]- ... that occupational epidemiology is the study of health outcomes from exposure to workplace hazards? Source: [1]
- Reviewed: Ostreopsis
5x expanded by Asfyris (talk). Nominated by John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) at 18:01, 10 August 2017 (UTC).
Article is long enough and was recently expanded 5x. As far as I can tell, the nominator has already had 5 DYK nominations, so a QPQ review requirement still needs to be met. And while the hook is appropriately cited in the article, it really doesn't seem "hook-y" - it's essentially just a definition of the subject (X is Y).--Slon02 (talk) 20:00, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
- QPQ provided. How about this? John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) 19:28, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
- ATL1: ... that early occupational epidemiology studies established health risk factors for gold and silver miners, chimney sweeps, and workers using asbestos? Source: [2]
- QPQ provided. How about this? John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) 19:28, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
- @John P. Sadowski (NIOSH): Looks good. However, you need to cite the two sentences in the article that deal with miners' health—even if the citation at the end of the paragraph covers them, it needs to be repeated at the end of those two sentences. See Rule 3b: "Each fact in the hook must be supported in the article by at least one inline citation to a reliable source, appearing no later than the end of the sentence(s) offering that fact. Citations at the end of the paragraph are not sufficient." --Usernameunique (talk) 20:31, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Usernameunique and Slon02: I added it. John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) 18:04, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
Thanks, all set. --Usernameunique (talk) 02:10, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Usernameunique and Slon02: I added it. John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) 18:04, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
