The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 01:30, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
ALT1: ... that the Paleoflora of the Eocene Okanagan Highlands are mostly compression floras (fossil pictured), but chert, coal, and amber are also present? Source: Pigg & DeVore 2016, Archibald et al. 2018
Overall: @Kevmin: Great article. Im going to assume good faith on the offline sources and approve the nomination. Onegreatjoke (talk) 13:26, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
@Kevmin: I was going to promote ALT2, but I couldn't find a citation for the notion that the mixture of plants is "noted" – could you point me in the right direction? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 23:12, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Per West et al. (2020) Okanagan Highlands floras are broadly similar in floristic composition, comprised of a high diversity of plant genera typical of modern temperate deciduous and subtropical evergreen forests (DeVore and Pigg, 2010; Smith et al., 2012; Gushulak et al., 2016; Lowe et al., 2018).--Kevmin§ 15:20, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
since that's what the reference actually says? -- RoySmith(talk) 14:18, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Yes, that is what I should have written initially for the hook, I didn't catch that I had dropped the sub from subtropical when I wrote out the nomination. My apologies--Kevmin§ 14:36, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
@Kevmin: Great article. 
Im going to assume good faith on the offline sources and approve the nomination. Onegreatjoke (talk) 13:26, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
sorry for not approving earlier. Onegreatjoke (talk) 16:30, 9 November 2022 (UTC)