Template:Did you know nominations/Patterns of Evidence
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Allen3 talk 11:10, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Insufficient progress toward resolving outstanding issues
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Patterns of Evidence
[edit]- ... that Patterns of Evidence is a 2015 documentary film analysing research regarding the date and historicity of the Biblical Exodus?
Created by Sm8900 (talk). Self nominated at 17:20, 4 February 2015 (UTC).
- The proposed hook has a repetitious "new" in it. I'd suggest both are disposable: "...is a documentary film analysing research regarding the date and historicity of the Biblical Exodus". The vast majority of the current article is wholly uncited, but I don't know if that's a problem for DYK. --Dweller (talk) 15:57, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Full review needed now that hook has been adjusted. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:08, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
The article is new enough and long enough. The hook (134 characters) is short enough, is found in the article, and is cited. The nominator doesn't have five DYK's yet so a QPQ isn't needed. The problem is that the entire "content" section is entirely unreferenced, which goes against the "one citation per paragraph" rule. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:05, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Insufficient improvements made in a reasonable time. Rcsprinter123 (relate) @ 17:28, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
