Template:Did you know nominations/Sphecomyrminae
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 08:33, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Sphecomyrminae
[edit]- ... that the cretaceous subfamily Sphecomyrminae has not been included in several recent phylogenetic studies of the ant family?
- Reviewed: Boletinellus merulioides
- Comment: Reviewed Boletus illudens as part of the Template:Did you know nominations/Boletinellus merulioides multinomination
Created by Kevmin (talk). Self nominated at 17:47, 10 May 2013 (UTC).
Article size and date of creation fine. Hook fact is interesting, cited in the article and verified in online paper. The underlying message is that "the Sphecomyrminae is important and should be included in future studies of the ant family". Maybe someone with firsthand knowledge of English could double check whether this is clear enough. Oceanh (talk) 17:43, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
