Template:Did you know nominations/Starry Starry Night (film)

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Harrison49 (talk) 22:34, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Starry Starry Night (film)

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that Starry Starry Night was described as a "healthy example" of a China-Taiwan film collaboration?

• ALT1:... that the director Tom Lin initially planned the film Starry Starry Night as a "small art-house production"?
• Reviewed: Acha Septriasa, Irwansyah, Love Story (2011 film)

Created/expanded by Lionratz (talk). Self nom at 03:57, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

• Nicely laid out article, Production and Reception sections are well-written (though the latter is a bit quote-heavy). The Plot section needs a copyedit pretty badly though. Was this auto-translated or something? The rest of the prose is quite good. The Interior (Talk) 02:49, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
• Date is good. Length is about 1900 chars., minus the plot section and the quotes. Prefer original hook. Hook fact is verified to a statement by the film's director. He is a bit biased, but I suppose the fact that the collaboration happened at all is healthy. The Interior (Talk) 03:04, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for reviewing! I have done a minor copyedit on the plot. However, I do agree that it needs some more work. (And, as a matter of fact, I translated it from multiple Chinese websites, so maybe the grammar part is lacking and the prose does not flow well) Happy editing.-Lionratz (talk) 03:27, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

I've copyedited the Plot, think it reads better now. English online sources checked for close paraphrase/copyvio - source material properly paraphrased or quoted. Should be good to go. The Interior (Talk) 20:51, 27 November 2011 (UTC)