Template:Did you know nominations/United States v. ASCAP

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 ^talk 13:00, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

United States v. ASCAP

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that in United States v. ASCAP, the Second Circuit ruled that music downloads do not constitute "public performances"?

Created/expanded by Bjulve-ucb (talk). Nominated by Falsifian (talk) at 08:26, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

• Alt hook ... that in United States v. ASCAP, the Second Circuit ruled that music downloads do not constitute "public performances" entitling the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers from claiming higher royalties from online music vendors? Neutrality^talk 07:23, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

• Length, date and refs all check out fine: prefer the original hook, the alt is too long for my liking. I wikified the original hook a little. Harrias ^talk 10:39, 5 November 2011 (UTC)