Template:FLC withdrawn
I appreciate that you are acting in good faith, but it is best if featured lists are nominated by people who have worked closely on them. In this way, they can give reasoned replies to reviewers and be familiar enough with the sources to act on suggested improvements. Someone who has not worked on the article can not provide this input, so the nomination may continue until opposition to it becomes so overwhelming that the article is failed; this takes away time from reviewers. While the [[{{{1}}}]] article is of reasonable quality, it is not yet of featured quality, and principal contributors must be consulted before a nomination, as required in the featured list candidate instructions.
 | This template should always be substituted (i.e., use {{subst:FLC withdrawn}}). |
Usage
[edit]{{subst:FLC withdrawn|ArticleName}}
Produces:
I appreciate that you are acting in good faith, but it is best if featured lists are nominated by people who have worked closely on them. In this way, they can give reasoned replies to reviewers and be familiar enough with the sources to act on suggested improvements. Someone who has not worked on the article can not provide this input, so the nomination may continue until opposition to it becomes so overwhelming that the article is failed; this takes away time from reviewers. While the ArticleName article is of reasonable quality, it is not yet of featured quality, and principal contributors must be consulted before a nomination, as required in the featured list candidate instructions.
{{subst:FLC withdrawn|ArticleName|PR=yes}}
Produces:
I appreciate that you are acting in good faith, but it is best if featured lists are nominated by people who have worked closely on them. In this way, they can give reasoned replies to reviewers and be familiar enough with the sources to act on suggested improvements. Someone who has not worked on the article can not provide this input, so the nomination may continue until opposition to it becomes so overwhelming that the article is failed; this takes away time from reviewers. While the ArticleName article is of reasonable quality, it is not yet of featured quality, and principal contributors must be consulted before a nomination, as required in the featured list candidate instructions. You might consider first working the article up through peer review and good article candidacy to prepare for its nomination.
See also
[edit]- {{FAC withdrawn}}
- {{FARMessage}}
- {{GARMessage}}