Template talk:Authority control
 | Template:Authority control is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Authority control template. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
 | To help centralise discussions and keep related topics together, all sub-template talk pages and their related category talk pages; and the Lua module talk page, redirect here. |
 | This template was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
 | The contents of the Wikipedia talk:Authority control page were merged into Template talk:Authority control on 21 March 2022. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history. |
|
| Wikipedia authority control |
|---|
A more descriptive name?
[edit]I have little understanding of what the purpose of this template is, and seeing it at the bottom of a bunch of pages without any information or highlight descriptions is rather confusing. The name is especially confusing. The term "Authority control" implies that the template was added by some admin as a way to control the article in some sense. I suggest renaming it to something more descriptive that better illustrates what the use is. Looking at the talk history this has been suggested a number of times with no objections. Maybe something like "Wikipedia-external database links". Ergzay (talk) 12:13, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, we have had a few discussions about this, but no agreement on what to change it to. Authority control is the correct term, and we added "databases" on to this recently. I think the word "identifiers" should be in there somewhere — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 18:48, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Name proposal: Authority control identifiers. Grimes2 (talk) 19:22, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- "Authoritative identifiers" might be more accurate as a description. It is unrelated to the use of authority to control anybody else and so it is natural that the correct term for this data confuses and alarms some readers. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:45, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Could support either of those — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- "Authoritative identifiers" might be more accurate as a description. It is unrelated to the use of authority to control anybody else and so it is natural that the correct term for this data confuses and alarms some readers. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:45, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Name proposal: Authority control identifiers. Grimes2 (talk) 19:22, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Data structure
[edit]The config data is currently structured like this:
{
property = 227,
section = 2,
patterns = {'1[0123]?%d%d%d%d%d%d%d[0-9X]', '[47]%d%d%d%d%d%d%-%d', '[1-9]%d?%d?%d?%d?%d?%d?%d?%-[0-9X]', '3%d%d%d%d%d%d%d[0-9X]'},
link = 'https://d-nb.info/gnd/$1',
label = 'Germany',
remark = 'Authority data on people, corporations and subjects from the [[German National Library]] (DNB)'
}
I am thinking that the following might be more logical:
[227] = {
section = 2,
patterns = {'1[0123]?%d%d%d%d%d%d%d[0-9X]', '[47]%d%d%d%d%d%d%-%d', '[1-9]%d?%d?%d?%d?%d?%d?%d?%-[0-9X]', '3%d%d%d%d%d%d%d[0-9X]'},
link = 'https://d-nb.info/gnd/$1',
label = 'Germany',
remark = 'Authority data on people, corporations and subjects from the [[German National Library]] (DNB)'
}
This would allow direct access of the configuration of a particular property (i.e. 227 means GND ID (P227)) rather than iterating through the entire list — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:06, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Open Sanctions
[edit]Is it possible to edit the Authority Control structure to display the "Open Sanctions ID". This solution is implemented in "вс" Template in Russian wikipedia (Шаблон:Внешние ссылки). It is missing in English version.[1]
The solution is to add "* OpenSanctions Entity "
Look here Template:International sanctions Nbarchaeo (talk) 18:57, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- I have added this to the sandbox and there is an example below. Can you explain what this identifier is, and why it would be useful for the English Wikipedia? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:56, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Nbarchaeo — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:31, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- "OpenSanctions is an international database of persons and companies of political, criminal, or economic interest." Given that it suggests a cloud of suspicion about its listed people which might not be supported by a conviction, wouldn't it violate WP:BLPCRIME to list it here? It says "editors must seriously consider not including material—in any article—that suggests the person has committed or is accused of having committed a crime, unless a conviction has been secured for that crime". —David Eppstein (talk) 19:43, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hell no. Grossly contrary to WP:BLPCRIME policy. And even if it wasn't, it cites Wikipedia & Wikidata as a source.[1] AndyTheGrump (talk) 20:05, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- "OpenSanctions is a resource for journalists, activists, and financial service providers." https://demoweek.prototypefund.de/projects/23-open-sanctions.html Grimes2 (talk) 20:12, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Not done. Seems we should not add this — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:52, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Pencil
[edit]@Rich Farmbrough: what are you trying to achieve on Module:Authority control/sandbox? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:48, 2 October 2024 (UTC)