Template talk:Cambodian royal family

Template Cambodian royal family is part of WikiProject Cambodia, a project to improve all Cambodia-related articles. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group on Wikipedia, aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Cambodia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.CambodiaWikipedia:WikiProject CambodiaTemplate:WikiProject CambodiaCambodia articles

Cambodia To-do:

Let us work in the best reference and presentation of archaeological sites of Cambodia beyond Angkor like Sambor Prei Kuk, Angkor Borei (Takeo), etc.

Should disambiguate Republican Party for Democracy and Renewal and generally try to link up social conscience with right-wing values.

I'm looking for the best picture or any informations about the KAF's U-6 (Beaver). It seem that the KAF had 3 aircrafts. But in 1971, during the viet cong's sapper attack at the Pochentong Air Base,at least 1 Beaver was destroyed.In 1972 at leat 1 Beaver was refurbished with a new engine. http://www.khmerairforce.com/AAK-KAF/AVNK-AAK-KAF/Cambodia-Beaver-KAF.JPG

Thankfull for this info. [Unsigned]

Royalty and Nobility

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Royalty and Nobility, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of royalty and nobility on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Royalty and NobilityWikipedia:WikiProject Royalty and NobilityTemplate:WikiProject Royalty and NobilityRoyalty and Nobility articles

RfC notification

A request for comments which may impact this template has been started at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biographies#RfC on style in royal family templates. You are welcome to comment there. Fram (talk) 14:24, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obtrusive template

I find this template quite obtrusive and offering way too many names than the average person would care for. It gets in the way of other templates that have more notable information. The template here includes the grandchildren of Sihanouk, but they will likely never be notable enough to be worthy of an article. . --Dara (talk) 05:53, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Was thinking if it is possible to have it collapsed by default. --Dara (talk) 09:07, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

@Xaosflux, QEDK, and MusikAnimal:, As per request on Template:Cambodian_Royal_Family of I have used Template:History of Cambodia and Template:Japanese Imperial Family as inspiration, to make this new sandbox template, why I ask you for opinions, and if you approve that I move this from sandbox, to Template:Cambodian Royal Family. The reason for my request, is that I noticed, that the request of upgarding is done by a user who is not anymore active, and theres plenty of similair templates, of which noone requested an upgrade, why my work may have been a waist of time... Dan Koehl (talk) 10:46, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: According to the page's protection level you should be able to edit the page yourself. If you seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. —CYBERPOWER (Chat) 14:48, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You @Cyberpower678:, I have now updated th Template, but guess the sandbox can remain, or should it be deleted? Inspired by this, I will update more templates fron Category:Asian royal family templates during the next days. Dan Koehl (talk) 16:01, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Koehl, if it doesn't need to be deleted, then no. I only delete when it's warranted. —CYBERPOWER (Chat) 16:03, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Any particular reason for pinging me? I do see that your request's resolved so that's good. :) --qedk (t 愛 c) 18:59, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @QEDK:, only pinged you since Ive noticed you are interested in Template issues, and I just wanted to have a confirmation that the template Ive made is OK, before moving it. All well, Dan Koehl (talk) 07:39, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]