Jump to content

Template talk:Japanese WWII infantry weapons

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Copy editing from JA WP

[edit]

I'm planning on using the Japanese counterpart to add and slightly restyle this template while still conforming to the specific English guidelines. Any objections, shout 'em now or completely hold back. 71.229.23.9 (talk) 08:18, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, it's done! If there's any problem with the styling or you think I went too detail-happy, feel free to reply below me. 71.229.23.9 (talk) 10:55, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Certainly, you've introduced too much white space for no particular improvement that couldn't be handled by the presenation of the wikilinks or parentheses after entries. GraemeLeggett (talk) 11:57, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'd actually preferred a bit more specific point-outs such as which subgroups should be merged, but I'll take your rather generalized suggestion. Looking at it for about an hour or two now, I'm thinking of the rifle and handgun subgroups be merged back into one. Lemme have a go at it again. 71.229.23.9 (talk) 20:14, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Much less vertical-heavy now. Really wished there were more EN articles of Imperial arms. Keep the suggestions coming. 71.229.23.9 (talk) 20:43, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Sorry hit a random key while typing the edit summary. I split out the support weapons from the machine guns (very dense and hard to read). Moved a link to point to the merged flamethrower article, and shuffled the HMG order. Megapixie 03:04, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Background colour

[edit]

The dark brown background color makes the text quite hard to read (IE, default settings). Pavel Vozenilek 23:24, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

7 mm Nambu

[edit]

Any thoughts about adding a 7 mm Nambu article and adding it to the list? 66.191.19.68 (talk) 23:13, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Added. Surv1v4l1st (Talk|Contribs) 00:49, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]