User:CarlyleShom/Notable topics don't need Wikipedia articles anyway
![]() | This is an essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. |
Notable topics don't need Wikipedia articles anyway. Articles about them would exist even if Wikipedia did not exist. If several reliable independent secondary sources have written articles about the history of a subject outside Wikipedia, then it is probably a notable topic. Actual notability is created by real life not inuniverse self-referenced notability criteria created by Wikipedians because Wikipedia itself is not a reliable source. If an article about a subject needs so bad to be written under a so-called Wikipedia notability criteria, then it is probably not notable in real life. There are probably several animal species have not been researched, and no cure for several diseases. Science has no answer for several questions and no Wikipedia Notability criteria is going to change that.