User:Ealdgyth/2022 Arb Election votes

It's that time of year again...

Note that I'm looking for folks who have their eye on the main point of this whole enterprise - writing an encyclopedia. With that in mind, I want content contributions, or at least the concept that they support content contributors. If you're an admin or not really doesn't matter to me at all. In fact, NOT being an admin should be a requirement for at least one of the seats, quite honestly. I'm also looking for folks who don't get so wrapped up in enforcing civility or rules that they forget that first goal above, the writing of the encyclopedia. I don't want to have my work interrupted by idiots who don't know the first thing about subject matter but who seem to think that their opinion on some tangental matter should trump the folks in the trenches writing the content and dealing with the vandals.

To that end - I wish folks had at least 45-50% of their contributions to article space, unless they show a LOT of clue in supporting content creation. Stupid ruleslawyering or spending ages at ANI will not get you much support here. Well, that's a great goal, but no way can I just judge candidates on that ... because very few candidates meet that standard. And a few of the ones that do, are not otherwise qualified, at least in my eyes.

In line with the last few years, I'm much less likely to approve of folks who are hardline on civility, for example. Also note that I do not consider myself suited for ArbCom, I do not deal well with high stress situations nor do I have the tact required. Whether I think someone is suited for ArbCom has nothing to do with whether I think they are good contributors to the project in other means.

As a side note, feel free to drop me a note on my talk page if you wish to discuss any of these.

And this is number 14 of these things I've done. Good gods, I'm turning into an institution. Over a decade. Yikes.

Past votes

Handy!

To integrate

In the spirit of fairness

- Edit tools 146K+ edits total. Account started editing May 2007. 70.7% to articles, 8.9% to article talk, 5.4% to user pages, 5.9% to user talk pages, 8.0% to wikipedia space, 0.6% to wikipedia talk pages. Last 500 edits go back to July 2022. 3 articles with over 1000 edits, 125+ articles with over 100 edits. 92 edits to ANI, 47 to AN. 840 "real" pages created. Is an admin. 58 FAs, 1 FL, 1 FT, 140 GAs.

The Candidates

Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2022/Candidates

Listed out

Support

- Past Arb Edit tools 109,000+ edits total. Account started editing Jan 2006. 54.7% to articles, 18.4% to article talk, 2.4% to user pages, 9.8% to user talk pages, 8.1% to wikipedia space, 2.6% to wikipedia talk pages. Last 500 edits go back to Nov 2022. 15 articles with over 100 edits. 89 edits to ANI, 52 to AN. 205 "real" pages created. Is an admin. No audited content claimed on user page.
Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2022/Candidates/SilkTork/Questions

User:Ealdgyth/2018 Arb Election votes#Support

User:Ealdgyth/2011 Arb Election votes#Support
I've never had issues with SilkTork's tenure on the committee and am glad to see them running again.

Slight support

- Edit tools 65,000+ edits total. Account started editing March 2019. 16.8% to articles, 0.9% to article talk, 20.9% to user pages, 35.2% to user talk pages, 23.7% to wikipedia space, 0.7% to wikipedia talk pages. Last 500 edits go back to late September. 0 articles with over 100 edits. 308 edits to ANI, 212 to AN. 10 "real" pages created. Is an admin. Claims 2 GAs on their talk page.
Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2022/Candidates/GeneralNotability/Questions

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Reversal_and_reinstatement_of_Athaenara's_block/Preliminary_statements#Statement_by_GeneralNotability
Agree with Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Reversal_and_reinstatement_of_Athaenara's_block/Preliminary_statements#Statement_by_GeneralNotability. There's just not much "here" but its at least not horrifically confrontational or agenda driven.
- Edit tools 27,000+ edits total. Account started editing March 2018. 39.5% to articles, 6.1% to article talk, 6.9% to user pages, 21.1% to user talk pages, 24.4% to wikipedia space, 0.8% to wikipedia talk pages. Last 500 edits go back to Aug 2022. 0 articles with over 100 edits. 120 edits to ANI, 182 to AN. 4 "real" pages created - 1 since deleted. Is an admin. No audited content claimed on their user page.
Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2022/Candidates/Moneytrees/Questions

Important bits about CCI. I can ... deal with this as a slight support.
- Current Arb Edit tools 201,000+ edits total. Account started editing Jan 2010. 39.1% to articles, 5.7% to article talk, 3.9% to user pages, 12% to user talk pages, 12.8% to wikipedia space, 4.5% to wikipedia talk pages. Last 500 edits go back to Nov 2022. 3 articles with over 100 edits. 337 edits to ANI, 1339 to AN. 159 "real" pages created - 38 since deleted. Is an admin. No audited content claimed on user page.
Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2022/Candidates/Primefac/Questions

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/RexxS/Proposed decision

User:Ealdgyth/2020 Arb Election votes#Support

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Reversal and reinstatement of Athaenara's block/Proposed decision
Voted to desysop RexxS. Generally I don't find them too egregious ...
- Edit tools 24,000+ edits total. Account started editing Jan 2016. 63.9% to articles, 3.8% to article talk, 5.4% to user pages, 15.7% to user talk pages, 8.4% to wikipedia space, 0.7% to wikipedia talk pages. Last 500 edits go back to Sept 2022. 7 articles with over 100 edits. 66 edits to ANI, 39 to AN. 24 "real" pages created - 4 since deleted. Is an admin. 1 GA.
Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2022/Candidates/Sdrqaz/Questions - note as of 12UTC 24 Nov - has not answered any questions yet, 36 hours in.

The discord mess

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Reversal_and_reinstatement_of_Athaenara's_block/Preliminary_statements#Statement_by_Sdrqaz,_regarding_TheresNoTime
The discord mess - thought they should be allowed. Some sense! I think I can ... deal with this..

Slight oppose

- Current Arb Edit tools 22,000+ edits total. Account started editing Feb 2014. 40.2% to articles, 10.6% to article talk, 2.8% to user pages, 25.6% to user talk pages, 17.5% to wikipedia space, 10.6% to wikipedia talk pages. Last 500 edits go back to late July. 4 articles with over 100 edits. 482 edits to ANI, 82 to AN. 31 "real" pages created. Is an admin. 2 FAs, 1 GA claimed.
Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2022/Candidates/CaptainEek/Questions

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/RexxS/Proposed_decision

User:Ealdgyth/2020 Arb Election votes#Neutral

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Reversal and reinstatement of Athaenara's block/Proposed decision
Waffled out on RexxS. The general feeling here is .. "meh" but the waffling on RexxS is enough to push to slight oppose.
- Current Arb Edit tools 26,000+ edits total. Account started editing Feb 2010. 18.8% to articles, 2.6% to article talk, 8.3% to user pages, 30.3% to user talk pages, 29.1% to wikipedia space, 5.9% to wikipedia talk pages. Last 500 edits go back to Aug 2022. 0 articles with over 100 edits. 35 edits to ANI, 142 to AN. 11 "real" pages created. Is an admin. 1 GA.
Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2022/Candidates/L235/Questions

Blocking on off-wiki evidence

Minor rant - but it's REALLY annoying that your signature is "KevinL" but your account name is L235.... I see you've added "aka L235" in smaller text but ... gah... annoying.

User:Ealdgyth/2020 Arb Election votes#Neutral

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Reversal and reinstatement of Athaenara's block/Proposed decision
Blocking on off-wiki evidence - thought it was okay. That's enough to push me into slighly opposing.

Oppose

- Edit tools 5000+ edits total. Account started editing March 2018. 70.1% to articles, 2.7% to article talk, 1.8% to user pages, 1.8% to user talk pages, 5.1% to wikipedia space, 1.9% to wikipedia talk pages. Last 500 edits go back to late October. 1 article with over 100 edits. 0 edits to ANI, 0 to AN. 10 "real" pages created - 7 since deleted. Is NOT an admin. No FAs or GAs claimed.
Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2022/Candidates/BoldLuis/Questions
This one is simple. No answers to the questions (hasn't edited since the 16th, even) and not greatly engaged with this community.
- Edit tools 197,000+ edits total. Account started editing July 2005. 14.4% to articles, 6.2% to article talk, 6.1% to user pages, 37.4% to user talk pages, 25.8% to wikipedia space, 3.4% to wikipedia talk pages. Last 500 edits go back to early November. 0 articles with over 100 edits. 1568 edits to ANI, 521 to AN. 252 "real" pages created - 73 have since been deleted. Is NOT an admin. No audited content claimed on user page.
Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2022/Candidates/Robert McClenon/Questions

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Reversal_and_reinstatement_of_Athaenara's_block/Preliminary_statements#Statement_by_Robert_McClenon_(_TNT_and_Lourdes)
No. Their "my way or the highway" approach to dispute resolution makes WP:DRN a rules-bound quagmire that is next to useless. There's a place for a non-admin on ArbCom, but Robert's not that non-admin. And frankly, not answering any questions 36 hours after they were placed is a REAL bad look.
- Edit tools 47,000+ edits total. Account started editing Nov 2012. 37.4% to articles, 5.5% to article talk, 10.7% to user pages, 21% to user talk pages, 20% to wikipedia space, 1.5% to wikipedia talk pages. Last 500 edits go back to Nov 2022. 3 articles with over 100 edits. 544 edits to ANI, 256 to AN. 49 "real" pages created - 18 since deleted. Is an admin. 1 GA.
Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2022/Candidates/Tamzin/Questions

MP SPI

Blocking on off-wiki evidence

Wikipedia talk:No Nazis#Do not endorse, but support blocking for hate speech/conduct/affiliation

User:Tamzin/340/112/16: An RfA debrief

Dennis, Cullen
THe above, plus the discussion with RoySmith and the conflict with JoeRoe (who, I will admit, is someone I don't always agree with)... makes the temperament very iffy for ArbCom. We've had "confrontational" and "issue-driven" committee members in the past and they usually don't work out well. (Rembember AlexShih? BuRob? Heh... I do.) Just too much temperament issues combined with too soon. We want deliberation and placidity on the committee, not confrontation.

Neutral

- Past Arb Edit tools 24,000+ edits total. Account started editing Nov 2009. 28.8% to articles, 7.3% to article talk, 3.1% to user pages, 23.8% to user talk pages, 26.8% to wikipedia space, 4.6% to wikipedia talk pages. Last 500 edits go back to mid October. 5 articles with over 100 edits. 247 edits to ANI, 89 to AN. 65 "real" pages created. Is an admin. 2 FAs, 6 FLs, 1 FP, 10 GAs claimed.
Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2022/Candidates/Guerillero/Questions

MP SPI

User:Ealdgyth/2021 Arb Election votes#Slight support

User:Ealdgyth/2020 Arb Election votes#Neutral

User:Ealdgyth/2014 Arb Election votes#Support

User:Ealdgyth/2013 Arb Election votes#Support

User:Ealdgyth/2012 Arb Election votes#Neutral
I missed the OK boomer bit... and ... I'm concerned that he's not getting the idea that folks don't want him back on the committee. I ... just don't see it happening and it's probably best if Guerillero directs his energies elsewhere.
- Current Arb Edit tools 36,000+ edits total. Account started editing June 2006. 28% to articles, 11.1% to article talk, 5% to user pages, 17.9% to user talk pages, 27.5% to wikipedia space, 8.8% to wikipedia talk pages. Last 500 edits go back to Sept 2022. 0 articles with over 100 edits. 319 edits to ANI, 394 to AN. 231 "real" pages created. Is an admin. 2 FLs, 28 GAs.
Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2022/Candidates/Barkeep49/Questions

Blocking on off-wiki evidence

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/RexxS/Proposed_decision

The discord mess

User:Ealdgyth/2020 Arb Election votes#Support

User:Ealdgyth/2019 Arb Election votes#Slight oppose

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Reversal and reinstatement of Athaenara's block/Proposed decision
The ambivalence about Blocking on off-wiki evidence is concerning to me. Opposed desysoping RexxS. Discord voted to prevent usage of logs. I land at neutral because... there's things I like and things I dislike and I just ... can't go support.

Withdrawn

Cases I'll be leaning on for my thinking