Do not remove posts left by other users on another users talk page, such as you did with this edit. Thanks! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 13:55, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
No I shall not do it again. But it was a claer misunderstanding; you thought two of my articles, being two of Kermanshahi's!
It is cool, I knew whose articles they were, I was asking kermanshi to assist you in fixing up the grammer. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 13:59, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
where did you want to talk about? I also gave you a star bytheway. Kermanshahi 14:30, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
About the articles itself; did you liked 'em. One of them is about the History of Iran, you know, the one from the Bavand Dynasty. The other is about Dirus Rijkers, the naval hero. He was partly Iranian, I believe I heard that somewhere. Oh, and I am going to join the Iran project. -)-(-Haggawaga (|-|) Oegawagga-)-(- 14:33, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Do you have any references for these articles? It is very important that you provide where you got your information from. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 14:34, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
These are all mrlobs artickless on the Dutch wikipedia:cabaretier
unibrauw
Andrée de Jongh
De eeuw van mijn vader
Kampcommandant
Catrinus Mak
Lady Baden-Powell
Geertje van der Molen
legerpredikant
zeilmakerij
grappig
So that's 10. Well I recon if you work hard you can beat that, oh yes and The moderators there are annoying, Nowhere there are sources but if you edit they make you put sources or they delte everything. The Honorable Kermanshahi 17:48, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
They're not long artickles, most of them don't have much text. And well he doesnt share that opinion with you. The Honorable Kermanshahi 15:23, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
Than he'll et himself a rather unpleasent suprise sooner or later!
I have added some references to the Pier Gerlofs Donia article that I have used in the past and are relevant to information mentioned in this article.
Are you sure about the ancestoral line Haring Donia to the Galama family. My genealogy research indicates that Haring was related to the Galama family through the marriage of his granddaughter Trijn to Gale Yges Galama. Of course it is possible that Haring Donia could have a Galama grandparent, I just have not found info to support this.. if you have this info I would love to see it.... as Haring Donia is my Great Great...grandparent and I am a decendant of Pier Gerlof Donias sister Tijdt.
Thanks a lot! I'll give you some sources within a few days! It is great to have a decendant of the great Donian and Galama-families on this site! I find it highly intersting to hear his; the ancestor-related thing. And I feel flatterned to hear your compliments. -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 15:24, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
By the way great article on Ygo III Galama. I put the article in on Ygo Gales Galama sometime ago, now he is not so lonely.
Haggawaga - Oegawagga
Forgot to mention I have added sometime ago an article on Jancko Douwama, another famous Frisian and also a relative of Pier Gerlofs ... you may wish to incorporate this article as well. Ezza Ezza61 04:35, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
A fine thing, my friend, a fine thing indeed. It seems almost certain that the war has been won! -)-(-Haggawaga (|-|) Oegawagga-)-(- 14:08, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
As I've seen. Thanks for uploading that new information. And you have 730 contributions right now (but you're agreat contributor, so thats' changin' rapidly), so thats also pretty good. -)-(-Haggawaga (|-|) Oegawagga-)-(- 14:26, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
The casualties are the battles lost and he lost 2 battles: the battle of black buffalo and the battle of white cow so if any new battles/operations are held I'll add that aswell. The Honorable Kermanshahi 14:51, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Please stop this "user war" activity. It is not helping build the encyclopedia. --Geniac 14:52, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Yes but we have to stop it from that admin so just copy it to your pc and then delete this whole topic. The Honorable Kermanshahi 15:03, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
No, its fun! It ain't harming nobody! Where doing it just for fun, and i has stopped now. Please, explain it to the admin? It ain't nothing hostile! -)-(-Haggawaga (|-|) Oegawagga-)-(- 15:05, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
You might have taken Touch the clouds but mre than 3/4 of your pirate lucifer artickle is his, so I'd better add some more things if I where you or he might take it. The Honorable Kermanshahi 06:31, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Again, please stop this "user war" activity. Your contributions are welcome, but discussing what parts of an article are "owned" by a particular user is not constructive. Wikipedia articles are not owned by any one user. --Geniac 04:45, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I notice you nominated Dorus Rijkers for GA status. I'm not really reviewing the article, but I left a comment on the talk page. PeaceNT 19:02, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.
A few features that you might find helpful:
Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
We've developed a variety of guidelines for article structure and content, template use, categorization, and other issues that you may find useful.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the project coordinators, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Carom 20:29, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks. I'll try my best improving\helping the project,
Thanks for uploading Image:Dorus-1-.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:27, 17 April 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. howcheng {chat} 17:27, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
I have given sources, and fixed the image's summary, thanks for mentioning me! Greetings, -)-(-Haggawaga (|-|) Oegawagga-)-(- 17:39, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
I don't see it on that site. Can you give the exact URL of the page? It's framed, so if you have IE, right-click and pick properties to get the URL. If you are using Firefox, right-click and pick "This Frame" and then View Frame Info. With regards to Did You Know, please stop adding it to Next Update -- your hook is too long and the article needs to be scrutinized by the DYK admins before it can go on the Main Page. Thanks. howcheng {chat} 17:56, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Hello. While we appreciate that you seem to be enjoying yourself, it's of concern that you appear to be mainly using Wikipedia for social networking activities rather than improving encyclopedia articles. Please understand that Wikipedia is not a blog, webspace provider, or social networking site. If you continue your activities in this fashion, you may be subject to censure from the community. Thank you. --Geniac 15:57, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
As far as I can tell, the article you wrote did not get included on todays Did You Know (DYK) section. If it did, the administrator that updated it would have notified you and left a template on your talk page notifying you. First off, it is bad form, to include articles you created in the DYK/Next Update page, put it on the templates talk page where proposals are viewed and slected by administrators. Also, make sure your article meets the DYK requirements. Third of all, I reccomend removing the DYK tag from your userpage until the article actually gets shown! Good luck. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:57, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
I have a little bit of experience with the DYK section, i have had several articles featured there. Your "hook" as it is called was WAY too long. I shortened it so that the readers could get the main idea of what he was really known for. You dont want to be too speciifc or over wiki link in DYK nomination. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:27, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
On 17 April, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Dorus Rijkers, which you created and substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.
Thank you. I am really pleased! My second article I ever made, and its' now allready been chosen to be on the main page! I'm very proud, and happy with your help, Chris Kreider. And yours, Howcheng! Thanks a lot! -)-(-Haggawaga (|-|) Oegawagga-)-(- 19:15, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
I would reccomend replacing the DYK notices that you placed on your userpage with the template that Howcheng put on your talk page. Just copy and paste it. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 19:19, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Thats okay to me! Sorry, that I've forgotten the procedure. I'll await the reactions on the article, and see what happens, right? -)-(-Haggawaga (|-|) Oegawagga-)-(- 06:35, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi, after I asked you above to not add your article to the Next Update, you went and did it again. Please refrain from doing so. For one thing, it is considered bad form to move your own articles to the Next Update, especially because you're new to DYK. I'll admit to doing that myself, but I've been doing DYK for a while so I'm a trusted user. Also, there are a number of other articles in the queue before yours, so we are going to spotlight those first. Lastly, after having looked at Arumer Black Heap, I noticed that the article has no references, so there's no way it can be featured on DYK right now. Please add sources to the article and please be patient -- assuming it meets all the criteria, it will be picked. Regards, howcheng {chat} 16:45, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
My friend, DYK is about patience. If you created the article well, and have a good hook, it will eventually get there. If you would like an second opinion about a hook, feel free to let me know. However, please do not re-add your own DYK to the next update. I, even though I am an administrator and could add mine to anywhere I want, choose not to because of the obvious conflict of interest. IF you have any questions, please feel free to let me know. Thanks! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:09, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
I understand your point and opinion. I'm allready gald to have one did you know?-article; the second one can wait a while longer -)-(-Haggawaga (|-|) Oegawagga-)-(- 14:38, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Yep, I remeber my first DYK, I was very excited about it! That is why I kept contributing to it. Good luck and if you need any help or have any questions about something, please feel free to ask. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 14:39, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Well it's definetley your best artickle, isn't there a link to it on the main page? Mrlob told me something like that. Well I see you've also got a masterpiece in you. The Honorable Kermanshahi 15:46, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks. And there was temporaly a link to the main page. Such things ain't never forever, but still... it is quite good, your right about that. But your contributions are also very well, and your possibl even more respected. Or, right now, I think where even. And again, thanks! -)-(-Haggawaga (|-|) Oegawagga-)-(- 15:57, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
I think I read something about the bavand dynasty somewhere but I'm not sure where, it I find it I'll help expand your artickle. The Honorable Kermanshahi 17:10, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Okay, do that. It is certainly my last best article, and still, it ain't no stub. -)-(-Haggawaga (|-|) Oegawagga-)-(- 17:12, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
I'll have a look, I don't know much about it really. Do you maybe cause well it is a quite small artickle. The Honorable Kermanshahi 17:15, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
"War" or "User conflict"; call it what you will, in any case, please cease this activity. Wikipedia is not a game or a playsite. If you continue in this manner, you will be blocked from editing. --Geniac 16:20, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
I removed the image Image:Last surviving crew-member, 1999.JPG from your userpage. This is a copyrighted image probably used under a fair use criteria. These images are not permitted in the userpspace. All the other images looked good though. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 13:26, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Please do not introduce any form of vandalism to the userpages of other users, as you did to User:Paaskynen. Thank you. --Geniac 17:19, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Dorus-1-.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talkpage. Thank you. howcheng {chat} 16:14, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. --Geniac 19:20, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Please do not remove valid tags as you have done here and especially don't remove them with a misleading edit summary as you have done here. The tags are there to let people know what articles need attention. --OnoremDil 14:24, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello H.O. You are an ethusiastic contributor, but in this historical article you have made a number of edits containing assumptions for which there is no proof (e.g. we do not know for sure that the helmet and sword kept in Fryslân actually belonged to Pier. In addition, we do not know his actual height or weight (The height you suggest is highly unlikely, since the tallest man alive today is only 2,36 m and all men of such extreme size and weight suffer from health problems that make them of little use in battle). And we cannot say for a fact that he lifted a horse, that is just legend). You should therefore rewrite these things in terms of assumptions and not as factual claims (for the latter citations would be required). Have you asked the Fries Museum for the actual weight of the sword, or are you just guessing? Most sources give 6.6 kg as weight (Swords were not as heavy as you might think and a sword weighing 24 kg would be useless in battle even for a very strong man).
(Paaskynen 12:13, 25 April 2007 (UTC))
Well, lets say it's 7 kg, okay, thats' also what the Fries Museum says. I went there, 'cause I live in the Netherlands myself, an I went there once. That is more reliable and realistic. And the height of this man is just a guess, and needs to be brought up as a guess, not like a fact. The horse-lifting legend needs to be kept, but not as a fact, but a legend. So I'll rearrange these things, allmost all of 'em, from facts into assunptions\legends. Thanks for telling me, and I'll think twice before adding assuntions and legends as being facts. Thanks for telling me, and goodbye.
In the two images you provide of Piers he is not wielding a zweihander. In the painting he is wielding a much smaller sword and the statue shows a sword design inconsistent with all other scholarship on swords of that era. I assume that the sculptor has taken considerable artistic license, as the statue is clearly highly stylized. Is there any evidence that the sword in the Frisian museum is not a bearing sword[1]. The consensus amongst the Historical Europeans Swordsmanship community is that such swords were purely decorative. As such you must provide references to that particular sword actually being used in battle. Mercutio.Wilder 17:47, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Well, he did used a 2,15 meter long sword in battle. It is not particulary known if this sword is a Zweihander; it could be another type 'o blade. But I wasn't the one who added the Zweihander-type balde on the articles-page in first instant; someone else did. If he would have said longsword, for example, I would have putten Piers' name on that page; is just a must to have that man mentioned on the page, for wielding suvh an enormous blade of a type which is Zweihander, or at least something very similiar to it. -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 18:17, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
It has already been done. I also added some footnote citations. Please remeber that once you write it, You do not own it, and anybody can edit it. Good luck! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:31, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
I'll remember that just fine. Anyone may improve articles by adding useful things, and changing untrue\unusefull things. And you greatly improved the article, so THANKS A LOT! You saved me a lot a work, and improved the article! The tone is better now, absolutely. And next time I ask your help, I shall not ask it again before watching the article (You allready helped me!) Again, thanks, by -)-(-Haggawaga (|-|) Oegawagga-)-(- 17:40, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
I think you should remove it from this page and from Mrlob's otherwise we'll have 3 different ones. The Honorable Kermanshahi 14:42, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
You're right Kermanshahi, I'll do it immediatle ( from Mrlobs' page, not from mine)! -)-(-Haggawaga (|-|) Oegawagga-)-(- 14:45, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
All contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Murlock may be offensive or unwelcome. In case you are the user, please log in under that account and proceed to make the changes. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do, particularly to userpages. Take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. --Geniac 05:04, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi there, I was wondering why you removed the copyedit tag from Touch the Clouds. I think it is a good article but it needs alot of work on grammer, sentence structure and tone, all things that WP:LoCE can and will do if the tag is there to put it on their list. I think I am correct that perhaps English is not your first language and it might be difficult to see the things that need to be changed. This is not a criticism of you or the article, it is just a way to improve it. you can continue to add more information and then let someone from LoCE go over it to improve the language, but the tag does need to be there. Thanks!--killing sparrows (chirp!) 20:31, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
I see you have created other articles here on Wikipedia, Thanks! After you create them you could add the same tag, {{copyedit}} (without the tl| ), and then the article would go on the list for the copyedit group to work on. The list is long and it may be a while before it gets fixed but someone will eventually work on it. Thanks again for the work you do!--killing sparrows (chirp!) 21:04, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
I've created any articles. Watch the list on my user-page, and see if ou can improvespelling on some of 'em. Most of my articles are pretty good; watch the Dorus Rijkers article, for example! -)-(-Haggawaga (|-|) Oegawagga-)-(- 21:07, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Rescue of the Renown, 1888 included one or more links to the page Dutch, which is a disambiguation page. This type of page is intended to direct users to more specific topics. Ordinarily we try to avoid creating links to disambiguation pages, since it is preferable to link directly to the specific topic relevant to the context. You can help Wikipedia by revising the links you added to Rescue of the Renown, 1888 to refer directly to the most relevant topic. (This message was generated by an automatic process; if you believe it to be in error, please accept our apologies and report the error to help us improve this feature.) Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. RussBot 15:54, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
The April 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 14:02, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
It looks like a fun article to record, but I'm afraid that I wouldn't be good with the other languages. If I can help you to record it, just let me know! -SCEhardT 03:19, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
When you'll do the English version, I'll try the Dutch and the Frisian! Okay? Thanks! -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 06:37, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
We have to stop now, or we will both be blocked from using wikipedia. Speak to me about it om my talk page. I'll be deleting it soon. And Mrlob has given up the war so you won anyway. The Honorable Kermanshahi 14:36, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Okay. But keep the template. It caused me (and you also, BTW) to much work to make it for deleting it just now. -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 14:42, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Okay, right to he point: you said you wnated stars, and you can get 'em. In order to be not in troubvle, I wanted to do it silently. And not right now. I should see; within a week or some, you'll have yourself a new star. But I want one in return for it. A tireless-contributer-star, the one you have. bEcause I have 1350 edis now, and that deserves to be rewarded! Consider it, my Iranian comrade. And I'll delete this after your answer has arrived! -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 14:12, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
A tireless contributer barnstar ah. Thats a very high reward, but then you have done a lot so I'll have a lil look but what for star am I getting? I'd like a star I don't have yet. The Honorable Kermanshahi 14:21, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
I think I'm giving you a high award. It'll be a suprise, and I garuantee you, that you'll like it! -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 14:54, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
good. you have your reward, now yer better then mrlob but don't change the war table cus the war is finished. The Honorable Kermanshahi 14:58, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Okay. Its great. Give me the award in the evening; you'll have yours within two days. Satisfied, my Iranian comrade? -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 15:00, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Can you give me the location where you got Image:Supriatna, 1967.JPG. Did you take the picture of the individual yourself? If you did not, it is quite possible the image is not in the public domain. When tagging images as being in the public domain, please give a rationale for such tagging. I.E., you took the photo or created the work yourself, the copyright has expired, it is ineligible for copyright, etc etc. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 12:20, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
The copyright has expired, about two years ago. And yes, I've pictured the amn myself, when visiting Indonesia with some of my family. It now is for free use, and anyone is permtted to use the image for educational progress and goals, in order to give the world knowledge of this mostly respectable man; -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 12:23, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Please add citations or references to back up assertions you make in your article. Please read WP:CITE to learn how to cite. If you are really going to write excellent articles, there is NO way you can do it without properly citing. I have fixed much of the article, and requested citations beside certain assertions. As well, please be carefull when adding material into an already cited passage. Adding material without proper citations in an already cited passage may make it look like and part of what you added came from a citation where it did not. I cannot stress the importance of properly citing. IF material is not properly cited, it can be deleted as orignial research. I am assuming good faith and would like to see you start citing your additions. Thanks. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 16:14, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
I shall start citing very soon, Chris, and I do see your point. -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 16:15, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Please also take the time to read through your posts before submitting, as well as read up on the . There is no need for a section heading with only 1 line under it. Likewise, there is not always the need for section headings unless there is a logical ctouping of content. I.E., "lucifer" is not a very helpful heading. If there were several paragraphs on his nickname, where he got it, why it was given to him, then it might warrant a section heading "nickname" but otherwise, it is best to not. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 16:17, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
I might expand the section later. Untill now, you are right at this point; the section is to short to have a title even bigger than the text under it, itself! -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 16:20, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
wel at first I`me not claiming to be him actually i suspect my parents named me after this guy and my dad`s last name is supriatna so yeah and also i`m not related
Murlock
Okay than, lets have this conversation on your page! -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 16:16, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
I noticed you duplicated half of this discussion on my talk page, moving a new copy to the bottom of the page. In your edit summary you said "adding the unnanswered message on the bottom of this page". I'm not sure what unanswered message you were referring to? Let me know, and I'll try and get back to you as soon as possible. -Panser Born-(talk) 19:00, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Please don't move stuff around on user talk pages as you did to mine. I think you were trying to put two related discussions nearer each other. I agree with the move, but it left me with a bad taste. That should be for the user to decide. Frotz 08:29, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Well, I suppose you're right. I'll keep it in mind, Frotz. -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 14:45, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
I thaught I'd would be better to wait with that; after the admin-question and all that kinda shit! -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 08:13, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
I don't, I gave you yours after all. And BTW did you see I added the war table to the Holland Friesland wars. The Honorable Kermanshahi 08:27, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
I did; you greatly improved it; thanks! -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 08:29, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Well hurry up a bit with the finishing touch to my users page, cause I was expecting it yesterday. The Honorable Kermanshahi 08:36, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Patience is now highy recommended; when in a hurry, we could easily blow things up. Cool down, mate, you'll have it before the end of this day! And your getting well! Congratiulations with your 1000th contrib! -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 08:38, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thanks and I'll hope to recieve it. And you're getting well too, Congratiulations with your 3rd star. 1 tip, do not try to become an admin. The Honorable Kermanshahi 09:53, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
I ain't. Not now. I think I am not ready for that yet, Kermanshahi. But later, adminship seems worth a trie for requesting. Still, not now... -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 10:02, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Don't ty it at all, cause you know what happened last time. The Honorable Kermanshahi 10:17, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
I do. How could I ever forget it? Everything used to be better before that! But sill, I think I'll try. Carefull, and after several months. -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 10:21, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
I didn't know you found that everything used to be better before that. The Honorable Kermanshahi 10:54, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Well, it was; at that point, nobody acted overconcerned or annoying, and no admin ever bothered us (in a annoying way). Still, now, whe're better users. -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 20:18, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Yeah now they keep bothering us, everything we do we get an admin complaining about it, but hey you zaid I'd be getting my star yesterday and I still don't have it. The Honorable Kermanshahi 08:10, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
Time is a vfery precious thing. You'll have it soon, I'll make myself sure of. You are getting a great contributer, but you need to have faith in me, and patience, Kermanshahi, as I've allready said. And you know damn well I'm reliable, so... -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 15:24, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
How difficult can it be i'd be getting it 3 days ago and I still haven't got it. BTW stop complaining about my artickle, it's good. The Honorable Kermanshahi 15:50, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
I shall stop complaining. As you start showing patience. You'll have your star, sooner or later, and I ain't gonna tell you again. I've promised you you'll get one, so, you will get one! -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 16:11, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
I see you filed an AfD, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bleach (anime series), for a duplicate copy of the Bleach (manga) page. While this was better than just leaving it to sit, a more efficient course of action would be to have simply replaced the page with a redirect to the existing article on the subject instead of making everyone wait a week.
I would be willing to fix this and redirect the page now, but I thought it would be better to get your agreement first. Would you be willing to withdraw the AfD so that the page can be redirected instead? If so, just say so either here or on my talk page or at the AfD itself. I'll deal with the closing templates, redirection, and the off chance of taking bureaucratic flak for not going exactly by the book. --tjstrftalk 07:56, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
You might feel to contract Murlock, who created the page. But by my opinion, it is better to merge with the otherpage and redirect, yes. Thanks for asking my! -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 09:03, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
I tagged two of your uploaded images as possible infringes of copyright (Image:Grutte Pier (Pier Gerlofs Donia), 1622, book illustration.JPG) and Image:Piers%27_helm%2C_ann_1987_in_Sneek%2C_Frisia.jpg). You deleted this tags without waiting for an administrator to resolved this issue. I have added them again and I ask you to leave them there until the issue is resolved. Pmviersen 12:20, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Well, now I might. It ain't proper wiki-etiquette just to tag my uploaded images wthout telling the uploader! Mind it! And yes, I shall not delete them. Yet. -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 14:08, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
May be it isn't proper wiki-etiquette. But removing the tags and moving this page to another page, so it is no longer visible certainly is no proper wiki-etiquette! But thank you for leaving them this time. Pmviersen 09:26, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I came across the above article at Chris' talk page. It's extremely interesting. Would you mind if I went through the article to correct some instances of grammar which need attention? I also know how to reference, but will leave that to Chris. Let me know. Best wishes. Ref(chew)(do) 23:06, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
No, I wouldn't! I'd really like you to correct it, if you'd like, because my knowledge of English-gramma ain't very good. So, know you know! Feel feel to improve whatever you think needs to be improved, but try not to be to radical; I'd like to see most of it intact. Thanks for offering your help; it is certainly welcome, and that wayI wish you the bset of luck! -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 06:06, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Not radical in the slightest - it's just spelling and formation of words into proper English sentences - no vast content changes. I will have a go later (after the EnglishFA Cup Final - I used to be referenten/a referee!). Best wishes. Ref(chew)(do) 13:22, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Well, okay than! Enjoy watching your football- its' fun watching football; I allways watch it, but than only the major finals and semi-finals. And thanks for offering your help! -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 14:38, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
The football was poor!
OK, the grammar, spelling and punctuation are now done. Some of the claims made in the article will never be proved by references. I can tell you which ones if you would like, but I think I have done enough for now. Good luck with the rest of it. Ref(chew)(do) 19:39, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your help! You've done a great job improving the article. -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 06:56, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
I have added some references to the Pier Gerlofs Donia article that I have used in the past and are relevant to information mentioned in this article.
Are you sure about the ancestoral line Haring Donia to the Galama family. My genealogy research indicates that Haring was related to the Galama family through the marriage of his granddaughter Trijn to Gale Yges Galama. Of course it is possible that Haring Donia could have a Galama grandparent, I just have not found info to support this.. if you have this info I would love to see it.... as Haring Donia is my Great Great...grandparent and I am a decendant of Pier Gerlof Donias sister Tijdt.
By the way great article on Ygo III Galama. I put the article in on Ygo Gales Galama sometime ago, now he is not so lonely.
Thanks a lot! I'll give you some sources within a few days! It is great to have a decendant of the great Donian and Galama-families on this site! I find it highly intersting to hear his; the ancestor-related thing. And I feel flatterned to hear your compliments. -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 15:24, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Haggawaga - Oegawagga
Sorry to point out the obvious but seems to me your article on Ygo III Galama is coming under a bit of scrutiny because of some obvious errors/inaccuracies that you should fix asap before others do.
1. Genealogy research indicates Ygo died in Antioch in 1099 (which was 'after' the siege of Antioch I believe) but he certainly did not die in circa 1198 (your article: born 1139, died at age 59) which was well after the first crusade.
2. The references you have quoted appear to be cut and paste from Ygo Gales Galama article, those references do not mention Ygo III Galama only Ygo Gales Galama. Langenberg Genealogy and Holkema Genealogy refers to Ygo III Galama as Ygo Joukes Galama and only mentions his death and burial in 1099 at Antioch.
3. I am very suspect about the ancestory of Pier Gerlofs Donia and Haring Harinxma to Ygo III Galama ... I do not think they are related. You should fix this on your Pier Gerlofs Donia article as well.
Sorry about the bad news but if its not accurate its not worth recording. Like I said, if in doubt leave it out.
Jo ha in soad wurk jjir dien. Mar ik bin tige neiskjirrig wat jo boarne is. Ik ha ek nog wat informaasje foun. Sjog mar op http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Igo_Galema At jo sykje op it familjewapen komme jo in stik fjirder. Groetnis, Bornestera 17:54, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Bedankt! Fryslan Boppe! \ I'll see for it! -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 05:26, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Grutte Pier as been seen in Floris (serie).JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ilse@ 13:19, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
I smiled when I found out that I was of Frisian ancestry, but other users might not find it so funny. I suggest that you remove the userbox from the other userpages where you put it in order not to bother people. If you like to play jokes on other users, a better way is to leave a message on the user talk page saying: "I hereby appoint you king of the Frisians!" and adding the userbox. Cheers! YechielMan 17:49, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
I just put up a proposal for a WikiProject about the Frisians. Would you be so nice as to support it? Thanks! --Benne ['bɛnə] (talk) 19:24, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Yes, I would be honoured to join, Benne! -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 07:31, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Someone is vandalising my user and user talk-page; stop it, please, have the bastards banned! -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 08:05, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Sure, but I'm refering to your edits of user pages. It looks as if, in certain instances, you identify the ethnicity or nationality of other users on their userpages with userboxes — seemingly without consent. How do you account for these edits? El_C 08:11, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
People who speak Dutch, contribute to Dutch articles and are members to Dutch wiki, are Dutch-sers. Same goes (even more ) for the Frisian users (Frisian is hard to understand for no-frisians). -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 08:13, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
That notwithstanding, are you positive that you have the consent of each user to identify them as such? El_C 08:19, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
I can add uch templates to their pages. When they don't like 'em, they can delete 'em. Is that a valid answer? -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 08:26, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
I'm afraid not. You can tell them about this or that userbox on their talk pages, but not add them to userpages without consent. Thanks. El_C 08:32, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
I'll keep this in mind, El_C, and no longer do this. -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 10:46, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
I'm afraid I can't block anyone. I'm not an admin. It does look like they have vandalized your page, which means you should leave a warning, possible starting with {{subst:uw-upv1}} and moving up through uw-upv4 on their talk page. If they continue vandalizing after being warned, report it to WP:AIV. What you shouldn't be doing is logging out and leaving inappropriate messages on their talk page and vandalizing their user page in retaliation. --OnoremDil 09:25, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Another note after looking through your contributions. You appear to be editing quite a few other people's user pages. It's my experience that most people do not like that. The vandalism on your own userpage might be happening partly because of that. I suggest you stay away from other user pages completely for a while and see if that helps. --OnoremDil 09:46, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
You would have to have one of the most vandalised user pages of all time, why do they pick on you--AdamJWC 09:43, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
That takes to much time. I want this guy to be temporaly blocked, before he strkes again; besides, he hasn't done anything to contributo to wikipedia, nor to articles orger than his user-page. Same ges to the Ip-adress I've entioned; he had around vife warnings; just block 'em, please! -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 12:34, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
I have warned him. we do not block people with out appropriate warnings. I agree with the above statement that you make similar edits as well. Is the guy making these edits to your userpage a friend of yours or something? -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 13:25, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Well, kinda. I know him, thats it. But on wikipedia, he certainly isn't! He keeps on vandalising thins, its annoying, and I want it to stop! -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 14:56, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
remain cool!. He has attempted to write good articles. He may not understand how the wiki way works. Furthermore, remeber that you do not own your userpage. Nonsensisical edits while annoying are not necessarily cause for blocking. Plus, they are not active now. Show me where he is activley vandalising a main space article or causing serious harm to this project. Look at it in the big picture, he is making a few annoying edits. There are disruptive editors that creat 100's of sock puppets a day to vandalise 1000's of times. Just calm down a bit! 14:58, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
It looks like this user has already been blocked on 30 May for 24 hours. The user has not made any more edits since the block expired, so I don't feel that s/he needs to be blocked again. Let me know if you continue to have problems with this user. ~ Amalasrawr=^_^= 15:34, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Biography is holding a three month long assessment drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unassessed articles. The drive is running from June 1, 2007 – September 1, 2007.
Awards to be won range from delicacies such as the WikiCookie to the great Golden Wiki Award.
There are over 110,000 articles to assess so please visit the drive's page and help out!
You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.
Account blocked as its apparently compromised and being used by another editor this commentGnangarra 13:17, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
I'm innocent. I do now Kermanshahi and Murlock, but not in real life! The story of Kermanshahi seems to fit reality. 24 hou sof editing, well, I can deal wih that (altough I did not deserve it), but it shouldn't get any worse from now on. I'd like to get unblocked now. And calling me schoolchild; thats really harrassing me, dammit!-)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 14:02, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
what if in your edits is your adding personal information without discussion to User:Murlocks page this edit Kermanshahi has similar types of edits, I think you are all the same person. Gnangarra 14:30, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Well, than perform a checkuser and find it out, Gnangarra! An let this thing be over, forever. I don't like these things; they're spoiling my wikipedia-reputation. -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 16:04, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
You are really sometimed behaeving like a "kjellebolle" (= calf-bull) Wikipedia likes it a bit professional, the fun part is only on the "my talk" pages. But better is it to spent time on completing articles. Specially Frisian history, which has been hidden for many, there is something to do. cheers, Bornestera 19:51, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks. And yes, I can read Dutch (I'm Dutch myself and life in the Netherlands). Echt waaar, Bonestra, 't is zo as 'k zeg! -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 09:29, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
The damn, undeserved, false and unfaithful blocking crisis!
Ask -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider), he can help me, I guess. I'm being blocked. And I've done nothing wrong. You know I did some good contribs; don't let me be banned forever for some nonsense. -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 09:41, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
____
You are using this template in the wrong namespace. Use this template on your talk page instead.
You are using this template in the wrong namespace. Use this template on your talk page instead.
I think aboutquiting this site; all my images are being deleted, and so are most of myarticles; dammit, why? -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 10:14, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Not that I understand your request, but I have contacted Chrislk02 per your request. I note that you do not comment on the block rationale, specifically that you are a sock of a vandal editor. Sandstein 14:58, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
I am not a sock of any other editor on this site. I've got over 1700 edits, and your accusing me of being the sockpuppet of a vandalising editor and troublemaker who has got nothing more than 200 edits, most of all nonsense? It just doesn't make any sense, this thing! I've done a lot of good things for this site. I've expanded many biography article, created lot, (even one DYK- article), and improved a lot also. Ands I've uploaded\created many images for the illustration of many articles. I don't think, you help wikipedia by banning\blocking a good contributor, because I am now forced to quit my good work. I know, I sometimes did small vandalism, but nothing major, nor worse enough to block a man from editing for it. So please, consider to take a closer look at my activities in the past, and all the good things did, not only the bad ones. I've worked with many editors who can say nothing than good about me as an editor\contributor (and some might say the opposite). Please, think about it. Greetings,
I am looking into this. Your articles as far as i can see were innapropriatly deleted. I am undeleting many of them. GIce me a little while to see if I can sort this out. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 22:24, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
I have unblocked you. I and several other editors will be wathcing you though so make sure that your actions are above reproach. If an article is nominated for articles for deletion, please follow the rules regarding it. This means do not get a bunch of friends where you work to log on and vote keep. This is known as meatpuppetry. Similarly, do not create alternate accounts to pad the votes. It will be found it. This is known as sockpupperty. I know that your article creation is in good faith which is why I am going to bat here for you. Please do not let me down. If you have any questions ASK before you do it. NExt time you get blocked I will not go to bat for you like I am now. Thanks and good luck. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 23:01, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for helping me, Chris. I'm really glad with you; you saved my account from being blocked! I wasn't even hoping that to happen; I thaught you would give my block a expiry-time, but you lifted the whole thing! Thanks, again, thanks a lot! And the articles which where deleted while I was bkocked from edititing; thanks for restoring those! You are right about the meatpuppeting; I didn't know that, but now I do (as you might have noticed, I don't knew all the rules yet, but I'm reading 'em again soon!). you have made me a very happy user, and I'll possibly never ever forget this. The other blocked users remain blocked, except for Kermashahi, who was obviously not a sock, but a good user having the wrong contacts. Now, finally, things are made up, and I can't thank you enough. But I think, I now did. Most honourabl greetings, from;
Please, in the future, be more careful changing userbox templates as you did to Template:user Dutch-ancestry2 (then named Template:user Dutch, whose redirect I just changed to Template:user Dutch-ancestry). Saying that one is of Dutch ancestry is not necessarily saying that you are proud of it (which I am indifferent on), and certainly not that one is a nationalist (which I personally consider an insult). I only noticed the changes today, and I can imagine there are plenty of other people in my situation, so I changed the redirect to a more neutral template.
I personally think this isn't right. Other templates also mention users to be proud of ther ancestry. And I don't see any point in don't be proud. That isn't nationalism, no even radical patriotism; its pride. Thats my opinion. -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 12:50, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Thats not your call. There can be templates for both. Please try to refrain from controversial actions such as that. Just because you are proud of your ancestry does not mean that everybody is like you. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 13:16, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Sadly, not in things like this. In others...
Never mind. I'll quit doing things like this. But I did this template-improvements before this block, weeks ago.
I am just saying, in general try to asvoid controversial actions. If you have a question if what you are about to do and how controversial it might be, feel free to ask me. Good luck. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 13:20, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
I currently am well aware of what is controversial and what isn't. Back then, when I made the template-edits, I wasn't. Still, your offer is a friendly one. I don't see any arm in my edits from the past. But when I'm not sure about something, then I'll feel fee to ask! -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 13:23, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
What was the point of this and then a quick removal of the warning for doing it? -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 13:27, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
I was well aware of what I was doing. Someone restored that text back to a version by 'emself, and I than re-added that with my version of it -- adding just one section to it, but still. I was still working at it, and the bot did his re-adding to soon. Nothing major. Nothing wrong. Really. And off course, I than remove that bot-placed message! -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 13:31, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
You blanked the page? i dont understand how that does what you explained. Just be careful. I told the guy who blocked you that I would keep an eye out. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 13:33, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
For your sake and mine, I'll now watch out. I've allready promised an editor on another wikito read all the rules, some time ago; I than joined the Simple Wiki, in order to remain usefull during my account block ;) .
The {{reqphoto}} belongs on talk pages and not in the mainspace. That is primariy why I removed it the first time. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 19:44, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Okay. I didn't now that; I thuaght it was an ordinary template! But now I know; you wereright by removing it. -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 19:49, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
specific pages refs are required - specially if there is little mention in the indexes :) SatuSuro 13:40, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks, Haggawaga - that would be good. He seems interesting. I've been working on a few Indonesian National Revolution articles (including Indonesian National Revolution and any more specific references would be useful. You seem to have done a lot of work on this article - nice one. :) I'm now working on Amir_Sjarifuddin - check it out. happy editing. Merbabu 13:43, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
You might search on google, but I'm not sure what you'll find. I can tell you, that I took the picture of the rebel Supriata myself. It was in the summer of 1967, that I saw him in Indonesia when on a trip to land (I was a sailorman and worked with the engine of a transport-ship). Indonesia than was allready independant for over 10 years (oficially since 1949), and so he wasn't a rebel back than. He looked older han he was, around 55 years old, but you could see he lived trough tough life. He agreed with me taking a picture of him. Its not the only one; I believe, I might have some pictures of which I'm standing next to Supriata. Does that provide enough information for the moment. I am the number one specialist about him on this wikipedia, I suppose, although my knowledge of Indonesian history itself might be less great. e image itself is higly styled; I'm not sure, but maybe its oiginally in colour. Anyway, thanks for your interest, SatuSuro. -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 13:47, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Wow, how did you meet him? Where? I read somewhere that two of his children are now actually MPs in the Indonesian parliament. But 23 children, that's incredible. My wife knows someone from West Timor - she is one of 19. Merbabu 14:06, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Well, I think I meeted him. He wasn't called Melano Supriatna, and I believe Supriata was just a nickname, as he told me. But I couldn't move the page, because a redirection page was allready made. I didn't started the article, at first. That was Kermanshahi's work. I was a sailorman, as I said. -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 14:10, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
I am just a bit curious why you cite anderson and there is not single mention of him in that book - and you do not specifically identify place of birth. To me it suggests lack of reasonable third party sources - I dont care whether you claim to be an expert on him or whatever - it verges on lack of reliable sources when I cannot find anything in the ref that you claim has something on him. If I were you - I would be very very careful what you say next - as so far it is not adding up to sustain the article - I would strongly suggest that you need something other than your personal experience - or 'number one specialist'. If you have any good sense you find something that actually names the person. SatuSuro 14:15, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Can't you tell us? You tell us you are the 'expert' and you contributed to 90% + of the article's information and provided the two references. [2]. Merbabu 14:23, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
It was a long time ago, so I don't now much right now. I'm getting older. But I did not add those refernces, I believe. As I told you, my account is also used by others, and I think someone else might have edited and contributed nonsense to the article. All I know, is that he was a former rebel. I went on shore, of the ship I worked as an engineer, and visisted a small town, a bit more inland. I can't give you an exact location right now; I must search for that. I know, that heir was a man in his mid fifty's when I met him, and that he was called Supriata, and enormously respected by the town folks. He agreed to be pictured by me, with my captains' camera, because I saw that the man was important, or at least used to be famous somedays. Thats how I got the picture. The text? I really don't know. -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 14:27, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
The article is notnow the subject of an AFD. So please keep this information here for reference - I've linked to it. I have actually read both the books you listed, but this was last year and I need to borrow them again to verify. Hence I asked for page numbers. thanks. Merbabu 23:43, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
I'll search for it, Merbabu, I'll give 'em in a few more days. -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 05:47, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
My apologies - i made a typo. It isnow the subject of an afd. Please see my changes above. Merbabu 06:17, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
You must provide references or your articles will be deleted. I have warned you about your account. The compromised account thing is not going to work any more. I have tried as much as I can to help you but being abrasive and disruptive then blaiming it on somebody else using the account is not going to cut it. Work with the people who are requesting references and if you keep claiming that "my grandson" or soembody else used my account, we will have no other choice than to block you. I really dont want to do that because I know you write good artices however you MUST be able to work collaborativley. Thanks! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 14:39, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Okay, I'll work things out. You're completely right about this. -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 18:24, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
I'm curious how this image is being released under the GFDL when the source you provided shows that it comes from contactpakistan.com whose copyright policies do not appear to release images or text under the GFDL. I have marked this image for speedy deletion. --OnoremDil 10:57, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
This picture is of an event that only happened 80 years ago. How is it that it could be public domain as life of the author plus 100 years? Please provide appropriate licensing information. A source for the picture must also be provided. I have listed this image at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. --OnoremDil 11:19, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
lieing about image copyrights in serious. If you do not know ASK! I know they are confusing but it it serious. I have deleted the one copyrighted infringement and would like you to provide a link to where you got the picture of dorus rijkers state funeral from. Thanks. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 11:28, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
I have not tagged this image yet, but it also concerns me. This image needs a source, and the author + 100 years is only applicable if the artist died within a couple years of painting it.
I'm not going to go through the rest of your uploads at the moment, but please go back and check to make sure you have provided a valid source and licensing image for these pictures. --OnoremDil 11:33, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
It is beliueved that Melano Supriatna is a hoax article. I know you have written several valid articles in the past so I am wondering if you may have spelled his name wrong? Please tell us where you got this information. Word of mouth, stories you have heard from others or pesronal experiences do not qualify as appropriate references because they are all orignial research. If you cannot provide reliable sources, the article will most likley be deleted. When I start writing an article, the FIRST thing I do is make sure i have a source to write from. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 12:04, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Chris, at what point to we stop pretending the AGF? Haggawaga - Oegawagga gave two authoritative books as sources; but we have shown this was bogus editing. I think we are beyond pretending AGF here. His edit is knowingly false. He then deliberately mislead us over the last 24 hours. Interesting that this article as been edited by editors that check user confirms as one. Ocking Jayat Mayaj is another apparently bogus article with the same 'gang' all editing. What's going on? Merbabu 12:26, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Next time you create an article without references, or we find that you created an article with false references, or you upload copyrighted material as being in the public domain you will be blocked. I do not want to have to do this but these acteions are VERY disruptive and damaging to this project. It takes large amounts of time to be sorting these issues out, time that could be best used elsewhere. Thanks -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 12:39, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading Image:Dorus-1-.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. PLease provide the source for this image. Gnangarra 13:27, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
I see you didn't have that much to do with this one. Do you think it is just more User:Murlock nonsense? He uses the same references you used for the Melano, at least one of which is false. Merbabu 13:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
I don't know User:Murlock that well. Considering his blocking, he doesn't seem a good editor. His talk page is protected, as I've seen while trying to contact him. Unprotect the thing, and send him a message. He seems to know more; He claims t be related to the man himself!. But my opinion; its a hoax. I'd say; keep. For now... -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 21:29, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
So you think it is a hoax, but we should keep it. hmmm. Merbabu 01:11, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
...and you did actually start it which suggests a connection with Murlock. The historys of these two hoaxes that you were 'both' involved with are extremely similar. Merbabu 08:04, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
Never mind. Redirect 'em both to Indonesian National Revolution, instead of just deleting 'em. And considercontacting Murlock himself, okay? I am not in the position to decide to keep articles or to delete 'em. I think, I'd better leave that to the admins. Understood? I just don't want to say "Go ahead, delete it", and it seems to be veriable after all, or "Well, keep it", and it shows up t be nonsense. So, I ain't touchin' this one! In my personal opinion, however, I advice to tell the articles original creators first. -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 08:49, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
The point is you were the 'original creator'. Merbabu 08:53, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
Oh. I just redirect it, because I thaught it was nonsense having a redlink to a non-excisting person. In any case, it would have been an insult to the man himself having a vandalising youngster claiming to be related to him. So I redirected it to an article I than was more sure about its truthfulness. Still, I wasn't he creator of an article; I was the creator of an redirect; he later created the article of he man he is related to (according to him). Te events he mentioned in the article, seemed to be realistic, but nonetheless, the man can't be verified to have excisted. Same goes for my article (not much more than vague claimes and an old picture). I now accerpt any choices you make. Whether o delete or to keep it; its all up to you. -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 09:02, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
Please let me know what text from the Google ref you used in this article. Thank you. --Geniac 15:07, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
I've noticed the sources you have provided to General Sayed Shirazi do not support the information in the article - only the bit about the hotel is mentioned. Could you please provide additional sources. As you of course know, everything in wikipedia must be verified by reliable sources. Merbabu 03:22, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
PS, I've now removed that Google reference too. Merbabu 03:53, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
I have blocked you for 24 hours for continuing to upload copyrighted images. I gave you a warning, asked you to not do it again and said that if you did you would recieve a block. Please before you upload any more images, ASK if they are copyrighted. This will require you to provide a source and any information about it. Thanks. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:25, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Sorry for re-uploading the image; I wasn't doing good. But I thaught the man should have an article with an image. For as far I'm aware, no copeyright was given. I wasat first uncertain at uploading, and when I did, it was deleted with reason.
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XV (May 2007)
The May 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 14:55, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
Did you hear it, your artickle: Melano Supriatna is nominated for delition and well it doesn't look to good. You do not have a single source and neither Melano Supriatna nor Supriata is to find on google, don't know what you're gonna do about this but I'd better put some sources if I was you. The Honorable Kermanshahi 17:19, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
It is to find on google, but you then find nonsense. Their seem to be loads of people by this name or last name. I don't like to see this one deleted, but rather prefer a redirection here. I shall see what I can do, but don't intend to give myself any false hope (I now know how the deletion policy is around here!). Anyway, thanks for telling me something I (sadly) allready knew. -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 19:41, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Alright. :-) As you might already know, this is an encyclopedia, and we must adhere to our NPOV policy. Now that we've set this straight, there are many sentences in both articles that violate this policy and are written in a biased tone. Yes, I know he might be considered a legend, but writing that someone is a legend without citing reliable (and neutral) references is considered bias and even original research. Also you can't say that "he was given a funeral that was so grand that it resembled a state funeral in size and style."; it's not a fact. You might rephrase it as "People attending the funeral described it as grand, with some comparing to a state funeral." Other sentences like "In the waters where he served, he saved such large number of people with such effectiveness that the survival statistics increased dramatically," "At the end of his career, although he remained active, his role became more symbolic in nature," "Dorus Rijkers had become a national hero and was by far the most popular Dutchman of those years," and "To have wielded such a weapon he must have been a man of unusual stature and physical strength" are not neutral. While the facts might be true, they are not confirmed and verified by any sources. Also, the articles have lots of praise but very few, or even no, criticisms. Cheers, Anastalk? 19:52, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Oh gosh, dear, you'll kill me for taking four days to get back to you! I swear, with the RL stuff that left me little time to edit, and the wiki-stuff I had to attend to, time just slipped through my fingers like sand... will you forgive me... please? ;) I didn't want to leave your question unanswered, because it was a beautiful compliment in itself; no, I don't consider myself an artist, and tho I draw in pencil every now and then, I'm not really good at it. The fact that you believed me to be one is perhaps the most beautiful mistake I've been subject of in a long, long time... but I'll never claim to be something I'm not. Again, thank you for the charming message, and I hope we talk more - your friendly sig is known to me, and nothing would please me more than seeing interacting with mine often ;) Have a beautiful day! Love, Phaedriel - 09:09, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Well, that lovely answer sure was worth waiting for over four days', Phaedriel! I would have waited for a month, when I would have knew that this would be your answer. Your writing style, though, and the wonderful way your user-page looked, made me believe that you were an artist. This way, I am certainly not feeling sorryt for my mistake! -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 10:45, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
So, i have done alot of assuming good faith on your part recently however good faith does not mean turining my back on innapropriate activity. My actions have come under scrutiny for this. This is a request from me that you do not repeat your controversial behavior. Being you were warned, it would no longer be considered good faith. Please feel free to contribute however you MUST and i mean MUST include a reliable source for ANY new articles that you create. The next time we find a source that is used falsley, you will be blocked. This is not to scare you, or give you paranoia, however to remind you to think carefully about what you do. before I write any article, I make sure I have at least 2 reliable sources. I often buy books, search books.google.com and other areas for reliable sources. Thanks and good luck. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 14:27, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Please stop editing the userpages of other users without consent as you did to User:TecTec. --Geniac 18:05, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Please stop trying to force other users to put nationality boxes on there userpage. That is COMPLETY up to the editor and NOT for you to do. If you continue to edit other editors userpages in such a manner, you will be blocked for disruption. Thanks in advance for ceasing these actions. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:11, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
I know you're right. But I created this users' page when he'd just started, and he liked that. He later improved it. I now improved it even more, but now, he disliked it. Shit happened, but it won't any longer. -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 12:37, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
