User:Khazar2/GAR
About my reviews
[edit]I think the Good Article project is one of the best initiatives on Wikipedia, so regardless of the outcome of a review, know that I think you're awesome just for working to bring an article to this point.
In reviews, I try to stick strictly to the criteria and treat the essay What the Good Article Criteria Are Not as a Bible. If I have additional suggestions, I'll try to make clear they're not needed for GA status. I pass about 75% of the articles I review. Out of those that I don't list, the most common reason is that the nominator doesn't return within a week to address the issues involved. I almost always do some minor copyediting for a review, but if I find myself correcting a number of misspellings and grammatical errors, I'll usually send the article back for more work before renomination or put it on hold for a week to see if another copyeditor can be found. If you ever have a question and want me to get back involved on an article I've reviewed, feel free to ping me.
Good Article reviews
[edit]Complete
[edit]
2015
In progress
[edit]To start
Quickfail log
[edit]In addition to my full reviews, in late 2013 I began patrolling new nominations for obvious quickfails (outstanding cleanup tags, driveby nominations of unprepared work, etc.). I list these separately to avoid distorting my review total and pass-fail rate.